Make multiple-pipeline-playback 99% identical to -capture again

[marc-hb]

While making recent changes to multiple-pipeline-capture.sh I had
vaguely noticed some similarities with multiple-pipeline-playback.sh but
I had naively not realized that they were both an exact copy/paste of
each other except for a couple lines. This commit make -playback catch
up with recent -capture enhancements. It also makes them nearly
identical again which is the first step before (painful) deduplication.

Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert marc.herbert@intel.com

[marc-hb]

As of November 18 the version of the (newer) -capture test this catches up to didn't have a single nightly test run yet.

In other words this is not ready for merge yet.

[marc-hb]

For https://sof-ci.01.org/softestpr/PR525/build412/devicetest/ APL_UP2_HDA was not available, everything else is PASS

[marc-hb]

Except for the current shortage of APL_UP2_HDA , https://sof-ci.01.org/softestpr/PR525/build412/devicetest was successful.

[marc-hb]

Once I'm all done I promise these tests will be all yours to deduplicate and clean-up! Appreciated.

These two test scripts are really almost exactly the same. After #525 is merged and successfully tested over some period of quiet (and rare) CI time, the easiest next step is probably to replace them both with one-line wrappers like this:

test-case/multiple-pipeline-playback.sh:

#!/bin/bash
multiple-pipeline-common.sh --prefer playback "$@"

test-case/multiple-pipeline-record.sh:

#!/bin/bash
multiple-pipeline-common.sh --prefer record "$@"

cc: @ranj063 , @aiChaoSONG

[xiulipan]

@marc-hb Do you consider to merge this two scripts to one and use a simple option for different test？
migration could be done with

• soft link like aplay/arecrod
• tmp wrapper script

[xiulipan]

These two test scripts are really almost exactly the same. After #525 is merged and successfully tested over some period of quiet (and rare) CI time, the easiest next step is probably to replace them both with one-line wrappers like this:

@marc-hb Seems we have same idea here.

[marc-hb]

SOFCI TEST

EDIT: only to get a bit one additional test round and some extra coverage with the latest version of everything.
EDIT2: https://sof-ci.01.org/softestpr/PR525/build417/devicetest has no failure

[aiChaoSONG]

LGTM

[marc-hb]

OK let's fast-track this, I think it's low-risk and it's blocking a number of next steps.

[marc-hb]

Deduplication submitted in #532, not ready for merge today considering the other changes already merged today but 100% ready for review, thanks!