Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the mix of ifdef is really hard to follow. And on line 148 it's rather suspicious to have SDW1-playback with index 0x202. That looks like a copy paste mistake to me, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it is intentional. ALH0x202 is the 2nd DAI for SDW1-Playback stream.
From line 54 to 79:
From line 139 to 162:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, but then let's stop using SDW1-playback, it's confusing. In some cases it does mean playback on Link1 and other it's just the playback stream1...
We can fix this in a follow-up, along with the rename of MONO which is misleading - should be SINGLE_AMP