Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[TEST] zep PR soc/intel_adsp: Correct linker syntax for ancient binutils #38374 - #4728
[TEST] zep PR soc/intel_adsp: Correct linker syntax for ancient binutils #38374#4728marc-hb wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
This reverts commit e963aa0.
Just realized that manually git fetching in EDIT: I have a solution to de-duplicate the CI code that clones Zephyr but it's based on (unrelated) #4733 which I submitted first. |
Even worse: the XCC failures (_without zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#38374 because the manual git fetch is not run) EDIT: the full build log with the actual build errors (and not just minor and irrelevant warnings) can be found at https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR4728/build10229/build/tgl-h_zph.txt |
06c9511 to
8b10a35CompareThis is needed by CI to clone only once and then take control of the iteration over platform builds. CI already does all that but by copy/paste/diverge of this clone() function. Once cloning Zephyr in CI code is de-duplicated and uses this new clone-only feature instead, it will be possible to submit any Zephyr commit to SOF testing. In other words it will make failed attempt thesofproject#4728 possible Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
marc-hb
commented
Sep 9, 2021
Fix part 1/2 submitted in #4740 |
This is needed by CI to clone only once and then take control of the iteration over platform builds. CI already does all that but by copy/paste/diverge of this clone() function. Once cloning Zephyr in CI code is de-duplicated and uses this new clone-only feature instead, it will be possible to submit any Zephyr commit to SOF testing. In other words it will make failed attempt #4728 possible Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
(NOT!) Testing zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#38374 tentative fix for XCC regression zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#38349