Doxygen: Increase DOT_GRAPH_MAX_NODES to 120

[singalsu]

This avoids a currently happening error:

"error: Include graph for 'src_ipc4_int32_table.h' not generated,
too many nodes (89), threshold is 50. Consider increasing
DOT_GRAPH_MAX_NODES."

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo seppo.ingalsuo@linux.intel.com

[marc-hb]

Not a big fan of this.

Can you share a screenshot of how a graph with ~ 100 nodes looks like? I'm afraid it won't be very useful - there must be a reason why the default is 50...

Another reason for this default: graph generation is by far the most time consuming part of doxygen. In fact it's often the ONLY time consuming part.

The alternative is to exclude generate code
https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/faq.html#faq_code How to exclude some code

Quoting a private chat from a certain @singalsu:

The file is computer generated and not interesting for document content.
...
But it needs to be added into the code generator too, so a bit more effort.

[singalsu]

@marc-hb Agree, I will try the other approach. It's OK if it doesn't suppress all src.h documentation, only the big rates matrix tables. The latter warning (see commit text) was from src.h that's not computer generated.

[marc-hb]

We run doxygen twice, the second time we add WARN_AS_ERROR = YES. This worked when I implemented this ages ago but now it merely prints and does not fail:

https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/runs/7138341491

[marc-hb]

This escape was a bug in doxygen, it has been fixed: https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/runs/7157109995

[marc-hb]

doxygen upgrade (and fix) submitted in

• [SKIP CI] .github: doxygen: upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04 #5979

Currently blocked by this warning.

[marc-hb]

I found a simple way to exclude files in #5995 (and there are others)

EDIT: alternative to this PR added to #5979

[singalsu]

I found a simple way to exclude files in #5995 (and there are others)

EDIT: alternative to this PR added to #5979

@marc-hb Thanks for the patches! I hope you didn't manually do the edits. I assume you didn't update SRC's Matlab generator script so I need to add those lines output there, right?

[singalsu]

Marc's patches solve this issue, so this approach is not needed.

[marc-hb]

@marc-hb Thanks for the patches! I hope you didn't manually do the edits.

No, I wrote a very small script of course :-)

I assume you didn't update SRC's Matlab generator script so I need to add those lines output there, right?

Unfortunately not, sorry I'm not familiar enough with Matlab. See commit message of 31b1478:

Temporary, manual solution until the \cond directive is also generated
by the sof/tools/tune/src/export.m script(s)

Welcome back from vacation! Can you do this? :-)