Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
topology2: merge multi-core test into nocodec topology - #8240
Conversation
4d891fe to
f3108f2Compare| { | ||
| index 6 | ||
| direction playback | ||
| core_id $SSP2_PCM_CORE_ID |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@RanderWang the suggested change is fine for the regular nocodec topology. But for the passthrough nocodec topology, I'd suggest to keep all core IDs as 0. @plbossart what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sure, I can image it. Removed.
f3108f2 to
dbb598dComparelgirdwood
commented
Sep 25, 2023
@RanderWang conflicts. |
dbb598d to
a8023d0CompareRanderWang
commented
Sep 26, 2023
rebased, thanks |
lgirdwood
commented
Sep 26, 2023
@RanderWang are we still expecting some rough edges ? |
RanderWang
commented
Sep 27, 2023
We have a [BUG] [v2.7-rc1] IPC timed out for 0x47000000|MOD_SET_DX when suspending on ADLP_RVP_NOCODEC #8072. I will check this issue later since it has low priority |
kv2019i
commented
Oct 2, 2023
@RanderWang#8072 has low priority only because we haven't seen it in a long time (i.e. observed reproduction rate is low). The cases with this PR also look different. 8072 is an IPC timeout, but here we see IPC error response "FW reported error: 4 - The system or resource is busy". |
kv2019i
commented
Oct 18, 2023
ping @RanderWang ? |
a8023d0 to
42c9f0eCompareRanderWang
commented
Oct 19, 2023
@kv2019i We get some issues with cavs platforms and I am debugging it |
4fccb54 to
432dbbaComparelgirdwood
commented
Oct 23, 2023
Does the newest update resolve issues ? |
RanderWang
commented
Oct 24, 2023
I just rebased the code. It is a fw bug and I am still debugging it |
RanderWang
commented
Oct 25, 2023
SOFCI TEST |
lgirdwood
commented
Oct 25, 2023
Does the latest update resolve the issue ? |
867c9e3 to
e62f19dCompare| DECLARE_TR_CTX(power_tr, SOF_UUID(power_uuid), LOG_LEVEL_INFO); | ||
| #if defined(CONFIG_PM_POLICY_CUSTOM) | ||
| struct pm_state_info default_pm_state = {PM_STATE_ACTIVE, 0, 0}; |
e62f19d to
b913dfeCompareb913dfe to
8011537CompareThe multi-core topology was created since multi-core feature had a few bugs at that time so it was for validation test. Now this feature works fine so merge it into nocodec topology then it will be tested by github CI. And we don't need to maintain a dedicated multi-core topology. Signed-off-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@intel.com>
8011537 to
b22a4d4Comparekv2019i
commented
Nov 10, 2023
Only single system PM fail now in https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR8240/build14811/devicetest/index.html , looks good to go. |
The multi-core topology was created since multi-core feature had a few bugs at that time so it was for validation test. Now this feature works fine so merge it into nocodec topology then it will be tested by github CI. And we don't need to maintain a dedicated multi-core topology.
