This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add valgrind - #709

Draft
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12
Draft

Add valgrind#709
Eeems wants to merge 6 commits into
testingfrom
Eeems-patch-12

Conversation

@Eeems

@EeemsEeems commented Jul 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Entware already contains valgrind, but it's not really useful for things built targeting the reMarkable instead of generic entware. It also appears to be missing some tools.

This does mean that we have a name conflict with the packages. I'm tempted to rename it to toltec-valgrind or remarkable-valgrind and mark it as conflicting with valgrind. Thoughts?

@EeemsEeems added the packages Add or improve packages of the repository label Jul 24, 2023
@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Well that's odd, when building locally with toltecmk it doesn't fail. Not sure why the exact same image fails here.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Okay, next issure. ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is stripped so we don't have debug symbols to work with.

@Eeems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like the toolchain contains unstripped versions of the libraries in the arm sysroot. I'm not really sure if it's worth trying to provide them in a package somehow? It would be possible to automate installing the toolchain, and then grabbing the files from the sysroot and stuffing them into a package that bind mounts them into a .debug folder in /lib and /usr/lib or something, whatever valgrind would need to work.

Is it worth it?

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

packagesAdd or improve packages of the repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Eeems