Bug
The docs site claims keypoint_detection and semantic_segmentation templates are "coming soon" or "still in flight" in three places, but both templates exist with READMEs on tracebloc/data-ingestorsdevelop:
A user reading the docs gets "contact support@tracebloc.io for guidance" when they could just clone the template. Adds friction and probably routes preventable support tickets.
Stale claims
Current "Links" column:
[Detailed structure](#image-keypoint-detection) <br></br>Template coming soon — contact [support@tracebloc.io](mailto:support@tracebloc.io)
Should match the format used for image_classification and object_detection rows:
[Detailed structure](#image-keypoint-detection) <br></br>[Example](https://github.com/tracebloc/data-ingestors/tree/develop/templates/keypoint_detection)
Same pattern:
[Detailed structure](#image-semantic-segmentation) <br></br>Template coming soon — contact [support@tracebloc.io](mailto:support@tracebloc.io)
→
[Detailed structure](#image-semantic-segmentation) <br></br>[Example](https://github.com/tracebloc/data-ingestors/tree/develop/templates/semantic_segmentation)
3. create-use-case/templates.mdx — table is missing both templates + has a stale paragraph
The table on this page lists 7 templates but is missing rows for keypoint_detection and semantic_segmentation. Line 20 says:
"Keypoint detection and semantic segmentation are supported, but ready-made templates are still in flight — contact support@tracebloc.io for guidance in the meantime."
Fix: add the two missing rows, delete the "still in flight" sentence.
Acceptance
- A user reading either page learns that templates exist and can click straight through to them.
- Grep
coming soon|still in flight|template.*soon across develop returns no further hits on real templates (the legitimate your use case is not yet supported, contact us fallbacks should remain). - No other doc page implies these templates don't exist.
Refs
This was the second-class finding in a broader audit pass — the journey-order class is tracked under #28/#30 (both fixed). This one is a different bug class (stale claims about features/templates) but same underlying pattern: docs falling behind the codebase.
Bug
The docs site claims keypoint_detection and semantic_segmentation templates are "coming soon" or "still in flight" in three places, but both templates exist with READMEs on
tracebloc/data-ingestorsdevelop:templates/keypoint_detection— hasREADME.md,keypoint_detection.py, sample data, sample CSVtemplates/semantic_segmentation— hasREADME.md,semantic_segmentation.py, sample data, sample CSVA user reading the docs gets "contact support@tracebloc.io for guidance" when they could just clone the template. Adds friction and probably routes preventable support tickets.
Stale claims
1.
create-use-case/prerequisites.mdx:39— Keypoint Detection rowCurrent "Links" column:
Should match the format used for image_classification and object_detection rows:
2.
create-use-case/prerequisites.mdx:41— Semantic Segmentation rowSame pattern:
→
3.
create-use-case/templates.mdx— table is missing both templates + has a stale paragraphThe table on this page lists 7 templates but is missing rows for
keypoint_detectionandsemantic_segmentation. Line 20 says:Fix: add the two missing rows, delete the "still in flight" sentence.
Acceptance
coming soon|still in flight|template.*soonacrossdevelopreturns no further hits on real templates (the legitimateyour use case is not yet supported, contact usfallbacks should remain).Refs
This was the second-class finding in a broader audit pass — the journey-order class is tracked under #28/#30 (both fixed). This one is a different bug class (stale claims about features/templates) but same underlying pattern: docs falling behind the codebase.