Skip to content

Stale 'template coming soon' claims for keypoint_detection and semantic_segmentation — templates already exist #32

Description

@saadqbal

Bug

The docs site claims keypoint_detection and semantic_segmentation templates are "coming soon" or "still in flight" in three places, but both templates exist with READMEs on tracebloc/data-ingestorsdevelop:

A user reading the docs gets "contact support@tracebloc.io for guidance" when they could just clone the template. Adds friction and probably routes preventable support tickets.

Stale claims

1. create-use-case/prerequisites.mdx:39 — Keypoint Detection row

Current "Links" column:

[Detailed structure](#image-keypoint-detection) <br></br>Template coming soon — contact [support@tracebloc.io](mailto:support@tracebloc.io)

Should match the format used for image_classification and object_detection rows:

[Detailed structure](#image-keypoint-detection) <br></br>[Example](https://github.com/tracebloc/data-ingestors/tree/develop/templates/keypoint_detection)

2. create-use-case/prerequisites.mdx:41 — Semantic Segmentation row

Same pattern:

[Detailed structure](#image-semantic-segmentation) <br></br>Template coming soon — contact [support@tracebloc.io](mailto:support@tracebloc.io)

[Detailed structure](#image-semantic-segmentation) <br></br>[Example](https://github.com/tracebloc/data-ingestors/tree/develop/templates/semantic_segmentation)

3. create-use-case/templates.mdx — table is missing both templates + has a stale paragraph

The table on this page lists 7 templates but is missing rows for keypoint_detection and semantic_segmentation. Line 20 says:

"Keypoint detection and semantic segmentation are supported, but ready-made templates are still in flight — contact support@tracebloc.io for guidance in the meantime."

Fix: add the two missing rows, delete the "still in flight" sentence.

Acceptance

  • A user reading either page learns that templates exist and can click straight through to them.
  • Grep coming soon|still in flight|template.*soon across develop returns no further hits on real templates (the legitimate your use case is not yet supported, contact us fallbacks should remain).
  • No other doc page implies these templates don't exist.

Refs

This was the second-class finding in a broader audit pass — the journey-order class is tracked under #28/#30 (both fixed). This one is a different bug class (stale claims about features/templates) but same underlying pattern: docs falling behind the codebase.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions