Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[WIP] Add POUF template - #3
Conversation
pattivacek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The general idea looks good to me. Most of my suggestions are just capitalization issues based on the style guide; sorry for the deluge. There are also a couple points that I think should get rephrased because they imply that requirements in the Standard are merely suggestions.
Also, any reason to link to the 1.0.0 version instead of 1.0.1?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Patrick Vacek <patrickvacek@gmail.com>
cwaldren
commented
Jul 7, 2020
This is really quite helpful, thank you for putting it together. Is there a standard way to indicate that a POUF does not implement Uptane yet? Would that mean leaving |
mnm678
commented
Jul 7, 2020
We don't have an official way to support this, but leaving the |
JustinCappos
commented
Jul 7, 2020
I agree that some note (as obvious as possible) is a great idea. But we also really don't do much but just assign the POUF number, right? We could hold off from actually assigning the number until a POUF is compliant. |
To address some discussion during the 5/22 Uptane workshop about the usability of POUFs, I added a POUF template that lists all of the MAYs and SHOULDs from the standard that should be addressed by a POUF. I would appreciate any feedback on this approach.