Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Sorting Algorithms

This is a list of easy C++ basic sorting algorithms as well as a way to benchmark them one to another. Feel free to reuse this bits of code in any future project !

Comparison

Algorithms in speed order asymptotically (tested on random array data, c.f. benchmarks)

AlgorithmWorst time complexityAverage time complexityBest time complexityMemory usageImplementation difficultySpeed on random arrays
Quick SortO(n^2)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(logn)★★★★The fastest overall, beats all the other, even Merge Sort (by a thin margin though).
Merge SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)★★★Almost as fast as Quick Sort, beats also all the others below, is quite a lot faster than Heap Sort strangely enough.
Heap SortO(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)★★★★★Theoretically the fastest of all, but in reality it's beaten by Quick Sort and Merge Sort though it still beats Insertion/Selection/Bubble sort by a mile anytime, plus it's a nice algorithm IMO.
Selection SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Quite slow, but beats Insertion Sort (by a thin margin) and of course beats Bubble Sort.
Insertion SortO(n)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)★★Same as selection sort in all aspects, except that in the best case it's linear which means it beats every other algorithm if the array is already sorted, therefore it's nice to use on small arrays at the end of a Merge Sort for instance.
Bubble SortO(n^2)O(n^2)O(n^2)O(1)Arguably the slower of all sorting algorithm (except esotheric attempts like Boggo Sort). Many consider this the easiest to implement, though I'd say Insertion/Selection is a more obvious way of doing it intuitively.

The three major competitors 🏆

Major competitors

The other attempt… 🏳️

Other attempts

About

A library containing my best implementations of many sorting algorithms, see README.md for the full list

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages