Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435

Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged

Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
evantahler:master

Conversation

@evantahler

@evantahlerevantahler commented Sep 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:

If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.

Closes#1434

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 13, 2020•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.

@evantahlerevantahler mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2020
Merged
profnandaa
profnandaa approved these changes Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉

/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi

tux-tn
tux-tn approved these changes Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.

@evantahler

evantahler commented Sep 17, 2020•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.

@profnandaa

profnandaa commented Sep 18, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Sep 18, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?

@profnandaa

profnandaa commented Sep 18, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler

@evantahler

evantahler commented Sep 18, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 2a80c34 into validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler

evantahler commented Sep 18, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!

@profnandaa

profnandaa commented Sep 18, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.

@yomedyomed mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2020
Closed
@profnandaaprofnandaa mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2020
Merged
This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
Open
Closed
@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2022
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435
Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Conversation
@evantahler
@evantahlerevantahler
commented
Sep 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:
If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.
Closes#1434
Checklist
  •  PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  •  README updated (where applicable)
  •  Tests written (where applicable)
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Sep 13, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.

The diff coverage is 100.00%.
Impacted file tree graph
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data

Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.
@evantahlerevantahler
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2020
 Merged

profnandaa
profnandaa
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@profnandaaprofnandaa
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉
/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi
tux-tn
tux-tn
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
@tux-tntux-tn
left a comment
•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 17, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?
@tux-tn
tux-tn
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
merged commit 2a80c34
into
validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.
@yomedyomed
mentioned this pull request
Oct 7, 2020

Closed

@profnandaaprofnandaa
mentioned this pull request
Nov 29, 2020
 Merged


This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
 Open

 Closed

@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan
mentioned this pull request
Nov 22, 2022
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435
Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Conversation
@evantahler
@evantahlerevantahler
commented
Sep 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:
If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.
Closes#1434
Checklist
  •  PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  •  README updated (where applicable)
  •  Tests written (where applicable)
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Sep 13, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.

The diff coverage is 100.00%.
Impacted file tree graph
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data

Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.
@evantahlerevantahler
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2020
 Merged

profnandaa
profnandaa
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@profnandaaprofnandaa
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉
/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi
tux-tn
tux-tn
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
@tux-tntux-tn
left a comment
•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 17, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?
@tux-tn
tux-tn
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
merged commit 2a80c34
into
validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.
@yomedyomed
mentioned this pull request
Oct 7, 2020

Closed

@profnandaaprofnandaa
mentioned this pull request
Nov 29, 2020
 Merged


This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
 Open

 Closed

@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan
mentioned this pull request
Nov 22, 2022
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435
Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Conversation
@evantahler
@evantahlerevantahler
commented
Sep 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:
If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.
Closes#1434
Checklist
  •  PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  •  README updated (where applicable)
  •  Tests written (where applicable)
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Sep 13, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.

The diff coverage is 100.00%.
Impacted file tree graph
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data

Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.
@evantahlerevantahler
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2020
 Merged

profnandaa
profnandaa
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@profnandaaprofnandaa
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉
/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi
tux-tn
tux-tn
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
@tux-tntux-tn
left a comment
•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 17, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?
@tux-tn
tux-tn
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
merged commit 2a80c34
into
validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.
@yomedyomed
mentioned this pull request
Oct 7, 2020

Closed

@profnandaaprofnandaa
mentioned this pull request
Nov 29, 2020
 Merged


This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
 Open

 Closed

@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan
mentioned this pull request
Nov 22, 2022
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435
Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Conversation
@evantahler
@evantahlerevantahler
commented
Sep 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:
If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.
Closes#1434
Checklist
  •  PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  •  README updated (where applicable)
  •  Tests written (where applicable)
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Sep 13, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.

The diff coverage is 100.00%.
Impacted file tree graph
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data

Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.
@evantahlerevantahler
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2020
 Merged

profnandaa
profnandaa
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@profnandaaprofnandaa
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉
/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi
tux-tn
tux-tn
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
@tux-tntux-tn
left a comment
•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 17, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?
@tux-tn
tux-tn
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
merged commit 2a80c34
into
validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.
@yomedyomed
mentioned this pull request
Oct 7, 2020

Closed

@profnandaaprofnandaa
mentioned this pull request
Nov 29, 2020
 Merged


This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
 Open

 Closed

@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan
mentioned this pull request
Nov 22, 2022
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435
Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Conversation
@evantahler
@evantahlerevantahler
commented
Sep 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:
If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.
Closes#1434
Checklist
  •  PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  •  README updated (where applicable)
  •  Tests written (where applicable)
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Sep 13, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.

The diff coverage is 100.00%.
Impacted file tree graph
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data

Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.
@evantahlerevantahler
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2020
 Merged

profnandaa
profnandaa
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@profnandaaprofnandaa
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉
/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi
tux-tn
tux-tn
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
@tux-tntux-tn
left a comment
•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 17, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?
@tux-tn
tux-tn
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
merged commit 2a80c34
into
validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.
@yomedyomed
mentioned this pull request
Oct 7, 2020

Closed

@profnandaaprofnandaa
mentioned this pull request
Nov 29, 2020
 Merged


This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
 Open

 Closed

@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan
mentioned this pull request
Nov 22, 2022
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435
Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Conversation
@evantahler
@evantahlerevantahler
commented
Sep 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:
If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.
Closes#1434
Checklist
  •  PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  •  README updated (where applicable)
  •  Tests written (where applicable)
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Sep 13, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.

The diff coverage is 100.00%.
Impacted file tree graph
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data

Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.
@evantahlerevantahler
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2020
 Merged

profnandaa
profnandaa
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@profnandaaprofnandaa
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉
/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi
tux-tn
tux-tn
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
@tux-tntux-tn
left a comment
•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 17, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?
@tux-tn
tux-tn
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
merged commit 2a80c34
into
validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.
@yomedyomed
mentioned this pull request
Oct 7, 2020

Closed

@profnandaaprofnandaa
mentioned this pull request
Nov 29, 2020
 Merged


This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
 Open

 Closed

@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan
mentioned this pull request
Nov 22, 2022
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true - #1435
Merged
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Sep 18, 2020
Merged
Do not validate the length of email parts if ignore_max_length is true#1435
profnandaa merged 2 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom 
evantahler:master
Conversation
@evantahler
@evantahlerevantahler
commented
Sep 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR skips the special validation of the domain and user if ignore_max_length is set to true. The README already implies this behavior is happening:
If ignore_max_length is set to true, the validator will not check for the standard max length of an email.
Closes#1434
Checklist
  •  PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  •  README updated (where applicable)
  •  Tests written (where applicable)
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Sep 13, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
Merging #1435 into master will not change coverage.

The diff coverage is 100.00%.
Impacted file tree graph
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1435 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 1254 1254 =========================================
Hits 1254 1254 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data

Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...1f97a1f. Read the comment docs.
@evantahlerevantahler
mentioned this pull request
Sep 13, 2020
 Merged

profnandaa
profnandaa
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@profnandaaprofnandaa
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉
/cc. @tux-tn@ezkemboi
tux-tn
tux-tn
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
@tux-tntux-tn
left a comment
•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

EDIT: it's only skipping the validation for the user part, since we are using isFQDN internally and it's validating that the fqdn is less than 64 characters.
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 17, 2020•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @tux-tn - Is there something you would like me to do/change? I don't quite follow you comment.
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@tux-tn -- are there any changes that need to be made as per your comment?
@tux-tn
tux-tn
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa it depends, Should ignore_max_length also ignore domain length in email address or is it only used for the user part?
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@profnandaa -- maybe we just go with the userpart only, what do you think? @evantahler
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I think so too - the test case I provided is the use case I have... so this meets my needs!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
merged commit 2a80c34
into
validatorjs:masterSep 18, 2020
@evantahler
evantahler
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks! Please let me know when the next version is released!
@profnandaa
profnandaa
commented
Sep 18, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Cool; and sorry you just missed the September release train by minutes, so this will be queued up for our next release 20/10.
@yomedyomed
mentioned this pull request
Oct 7, 2020

Closed

@profnandaaprofnandaa
mentioned this pull request
Nov 29, 2020
 Merged


This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
 Open

 Closed

@abdulrahman-khankanabdulrahman-khankan
mentioned this pull request
Nov 22, 2022
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@profnandaaprofnandaaprofnandaa approved these changes
@tux-tntux-tntux-tn approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

🍿 discussionneeds-more-review

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to disable the "length" checks for isEmail

3 participants

@evantahler@profnandaa@tux-tn