feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option - #1641

Merged
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist
Oct 2, 2021
Merged

feat(isEmail): add host_blacklist option#1641
profnandaa merged 3 commits into
validatorjs:masterfrom
fedeci:email-domain-denylist

Conversation

@fedeci

@fedecifedeci commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We add an option to allow the user to exclude some specific domains from isEmail validation.
Fixes#1639

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1641 (ac4896c) into master (05ceb18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1641 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 1847 1849 +2 =========================================
+ Hits 1847 1849 +2 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
src/lib/isEmail.js100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05ceb18...ac4896c. Read the comment docs.

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little suggestion, we have a similar option in isURL called host_whitelist and host_blacklist that accepts hosts and regexes. What do you think about matching that behaviour to have consistency between validators options?

@fedeci

fedeci commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

@tux-tn

tux-tn commented Apr 16, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It makes sense but I would keep the denylist instead of blacklist to use an inclusive language at least in new options.

I have nothing against blacklist and whitelist, but someone may be offended by such terms.

Project maintainer views on this matter have already been shared here #1522

@fedecifedeci changed the title feat(isEmail): add domain_denylist optionfeat(isEmail): add host_blacklist optionApr 17, 2021
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's always a good time to change your mind 🤷‍♂️

@fedeci
fedeciforce-pushed the email-domain-denylist branch from 6e2b0e1 to ac4896cCompareApril 17, 2021 14:38
@fedeci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ping?

@tux-tntux-tn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
Sorry for the long review delay, i missed the notification about new commits in this PR !

@tux-tntux-tn added the ready-to-land For PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed label Oct 2, 2021

@profnandaaprofnandaa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-landFor PRs that are reviewed and ready to be landed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow business only email address

3 participants

@fedeci@tux-tn@profnandaa