chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference - #2161

Merged
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

chore(pull-request-template): Add note about providing a reference#2161
profnandaa merged 1 commit into
validatorjs:masterfrom
pano9000:chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2

Conversation

@pano9000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes#2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 30, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2161 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00% =========================================
Files 105 105 Lines 2334 2334 Branches 586 586 =========================================
Hits 2334 2334 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@WikiRikWikiRik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa
profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:masterFeb 8, 2023
@pano9000
pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants

@pano9000@profnandaa@WikiRik