International phone verification

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[Gp2mv3]

I think this regex can check if it's an international phone number.

[Gp2mv3]

I also can add a sanitize method for international phone numbers.

[chriso]

Phone validators have been suggested and rejected before. The reason is that there are a huge number of ways to represent a valid phone number and this differs greatly from country to country.

For example, in Australia, all of the following are valid phone numbers

0402 123 103
+61 2 8076 2123
(03) 89 565 000

[chriso]

I know this was a PR for international phone numbers, but there's still too much variance for this to be useful IMO.

The regex (/^\+(?:[0-9] ?){6,14}[0-9]$/) is too lenient and matches invalid phone numbers like +0 0 0 0 0 0 0