Skip to content

Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

Description

@AndrewBarba

Summary

Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

Versions observed

  • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
  • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
  • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

Numbers

20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)

Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

Repro

import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

Where the time appears to go

The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

Two adjacent observations:

  • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
  • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

Expected

A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

Actual

Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

Related

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local · Issue #2795 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
      Skip to content

      Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

      Description

      @AndrewBarba

      Summary

      Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

      On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

      This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

      Versions observed

      • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
      • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
      • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

      Numbers

      20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

      WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
      WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)
      

      Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

      Repro

      import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
      index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

      Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

      Where the time appears to go

      The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

      Two adjacent observations:

      • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
      • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

      Expected

      A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

      Actual

      Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

      Related

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local · Issue #2795 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
          Skip to content

          Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

          Description

          @AndrewBarba

          Summary

          Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

          On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

          This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

          Versions observed

          • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
          • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
          • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

          Numbers

          20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

          WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
          WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)
          

          Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

          Repro

          import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
          index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

          Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

          Where the time appears to go

          The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

          Two adjacent observations:

          • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
          • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

          Expected

          A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

          Actual

          Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

          Related

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local · Issue #2795 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
              Skip to content

              Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

              Description

              @AndrewBarba

              Summary

              Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

              On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

              This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

              Versions observed

              • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
              • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
              • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

              Numbers

              20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

              WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
              WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)
              

              Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

              Repro

              import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
              index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

              Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

              Where the time appears to go

              The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

              Two adjacent observations:

              • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
              • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

              Expected

              A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

              Actual

              Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

              Related

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local · Issue #2795 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
                  Skip to content

                  Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

                  Description

                  @AndrewBarba

                  Summary

                  Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

                  On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

                  This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

                  Versions observed

                  • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
                  • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
                  • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

                  Numbers

                  20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

                  WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
                  WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)
                  

                  Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

                  Repro

                  import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
                  index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

                  Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

                  Where the time appears to go

                  The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

                  Two adjacent observations:

                  • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
                  • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

                  Expected

                  A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

                  Actual

                  Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

                  Related

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local · Issue #2795 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
                      Skip to content

                      Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

                      Description

                      @AndrewBarba

                      Summary

                      Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

                      On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

                      This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

                      Versions observed

                      • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
                      • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
                      • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

                      Numbers

                      20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

                      WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
                      WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)
                      

                      Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

                      Repro

                      import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
                      index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

                      Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

                      Where the time appears to go

                      The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

                      Two adjacent observations:

                      • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
                      • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

                      Expected

                      A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

                      Actual

                      Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

                      Related

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local · Issue #2795 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
                          Skip to content

                          Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

                          Description

                          @AndrewBarba

                          Summary

                          Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

                          On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

                          This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

                          Versions observed

                          • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
                          • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
                          • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

                          Numbers

                          20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

                          WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
                          WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)
                          

                          Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

                          Repro

                          import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
                          index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

                          Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

                          Where the time appears to go

                          The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

                          Two adjacent observations:

                          • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
                          • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

                          Expected

                          A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

                          Actual

                          Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

                          Related

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local · Issue #2795 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
                              Skip to content

                              Serializing an AbortSignal into a step adds ~0.5s fixed latency per step invocation on world-local #2795

                              Description

                              @AndrewBarba

                              Summary

                              Passing an AbortSignal (or AbortController) into a step's arguments adds ~0.5 s of fixed latency to every invocation of that step on world-local — a ~7× slowdown for a trivial step (84 ms → ~600 ms). The cost is entirely on the step side: creating the controller in the workflow is free, and the same workflow with the signal omitted from the step input runs at full speed.

                              On a world that has accumulated stream chunks, the same signal-bearing step degrades far past the fixed cost — see the companion issue about the world-local streamer's polling (readdir-per-tick) behavior, filed separately.

                              This makes the documented cancellation pattern (durable AbortController, signal threaded into long-running steps) unusable in practice on world-local: we had to pull it out of a feature branch after a 100-turn session e2e went from ~0.9 s/turn to a 240 s replay timeout.

                              Versions observed

                              • @workflow/core@5.0.0-beta.26
                              • @workflow/world-local@5.0.0-beta.22 (via createLocalWorld; in-process handler, WORKFLOW_TURBO=0)
                              • Node v24, macOS (also reproduced on Linux CI)

                              Numbers

                              20 sequential trivial steps (append one line to a file, return):

                              WITHOUT signal: total=4025ms per-step deltas ≈ 84ms
                              WITH signal: total=13026ms per-step deltas ≈ 600ms (~+515ms per step, flat)
                              

                              Same shape inside our product's turn loop: per-turn latency 385 ms → 910 ms the moment the turn's one step carries a signal; bisected across five variants (hook only: free; controller created but signal not passed: free; signal passed: +~520 ms).

                              Repro

                              import{appendFile}from"node:fs/promises";exportasyncfunctiontimedStep(input: {logPath: string;index: number;abortSignal?: AbortSignal;}){"use step";awaitappendFile(input.logPath,`step ${input.index}${Date.now()}\n`);returninput.index;}exportasyncfunctionsignalCostWorkflow(input: {count: number;withSignal: boolean;logPath: string;}){"use workflow";constcontroller=newAbortController();for(letindex=0;index<input.count;index++){awaittimedStep({abortSignal: input.withSignal ? controller.signal : undefined,
                              index,logPath: input.logPath,});}return"done";}

                              Run once with withSignal: false and once with true; diff the timestamps.

                              Where the time appears to go

                              The serialized signal carries { streamName, hookToken }. On every step revival, the step host opens a tail reader on the abort stream for the step's entire duration (the real-time abort delivery path — gx(...) in the serialization chunk: new ox(runId, streamName).getReader() raced against a per-step teardown controller, pushed into the step context's ops). The ~0.5 s fixed cost tracks that reader's open/tail/teardown lifecycle against a stream that has no chunks and, in the common case, never will.

                              Two adjacent observations:

                              • The controller's abrt_… system hook is registered per controller and never disposed, so long-lived sessions creating one controller per unit of work accumulate live system hooks.
                              • The reader polls the chunk store every 100 ms with a full directory listing — that is the scaling half of this problem, filed separately with numbers.

                              Expected

                              A signal in step arguments should cost roughly what a hook read costs — ideally near-zero when never aborted: e.g. subscribe lazily/in-process first, or don't tie a polling stream tail's lifecycle to every step invocation.

                              Actual

                              Every invocation of a signal-bearing step pays ~0.5 s on world-local even in a fresh world, growing without bound as the world accumulates stream chunks.

                              Related

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions