Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Update withWorkflow and update docs - #123

Merged
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

Update withWorkflow and update docs#123
ijjk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ijjk/update-next-workflow

Conversation

@ijjk

@ijjkijjk commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noticed in #95 when a user is exporting a function from their next.config already they might not be aware that plugins can do this as well. This adds documentation for that case and also expands withWorkflow function to handle other plugins doing this as well.

Closes: #95

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dff9e70

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
NameType
@workflow/nextPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/aiPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentOct 28, 2025 8:36pm

@ijjk
ijjk merged commit 08ed58b into mainOct 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@ijjk
ijjk deleted the ijjk/update-next-workflow branch October 28, 2025 21:18
vercelBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2026
…tten summary verbatim, leaking injected `pr:`/`commit:` directive lines into the changelog so the entry title becomes literally `pr: #N`.
This commit fixes the issue reported at .changeset/changelog.mjs:368
## Bug
`maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` prepends directive lines to a backport changeset's summary:
```js
const rewrittenSummary =
`pr: #${originalPRNumber}\n` +
`commit: ${changeset.commit}\n` +
summary;
return { ...changeset, summary: rewrittenSummary };
```
The upstream `@changesets/changelog-github` `getReleaseLine` consumes those directives and **strips them** from the summary (via `.replace(/^\s*(?:pr|pull|pull\s+request):.../im, ...)`, `commit:`, `author:` etc.) before splitting into `firstLine`/`futureLines` and rendering. So in the normal path the directives never appear in the output — that's the whole point of injecting them.
The offline fallback, however, does **not** strip them:
```js
function offlineReleaseLine(changeset, options) {
const [firstLine, ...futureLines] = (changeset.summary ?? '')
.split('\n')
.map((l) => l.trimEnd());
...
}
```
It just splits on `\n` and renders verbatim.
### Concrete trigger
A backport changeset where:
1. `maybeRewriteChangesetForBackport` **succeeds** (network up, PR resolved, directives injected → `rewritten.summary` starts with `pr: #N\ncommit: <sha>\n`), and
2. the subsequent `limitUpstream(() => upstream.getReleaseLine(rewritten, ...))` **throws** — exactly the flaky/oversized GraphQL batch scenario this fallback was added for.
The catch block then ran `offlineReleaseLine(rewritten, options)`, producing:
```
- [`abc1234`](...) - pr: #123
commit: abc1234...
<real first line>
```
The entry title becomes literally `pr: #123` and `commit: …` leaks as body text.
## Fix
Pass the **original** `changeset` to `offlineReleaseLine` instead of `rewritten`. The backport rewrite only mutates `summary`; `changeset.commit` is untouched, so the offline commit link is identical, while the original summary has no injected directives. The offline path already drops PR/author attribution it can't resolve, so using the un-rewritten summary is exactly correct.
The dependency-line path (`offlineDependencyReleaseLine`) is unaffected since no directive injection happens there.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VaguelySerious <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

withWorkflow breaks the app. Next config

2 participants

@ijjk@TooTallNate