fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s - #1869

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(e2e): increase utf8StreamWorkflow test timeout to 120s#1869
karthikscale3 merged 94 commits into
mainfrom
karthik/bump-test-timeout

Conversation

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the utf8StreamWorkflow e2e test timeout from 60_000 to 120_000 ms to fix intermittent failures on the nitro workbench

Root cause

The test was added in #1852 with a 60s timeout, but occasionally fails when the 4th sequential step ('مرحبا بالعالم') is step_created but never step_started — meaning a Vercel Queue delivery is dropped and must be retried. A retry can take 30–60s, which exhausts the 60s budget.

This is infrastructure flakiness, not a code bug — the same test passes in most CI runs and the Arabic text is coincidental (it's just the 4th step). The convention for streaming workflow tests (readableStreamWorkflow, webhookWorkflow) is 120_000 ms, which gives enough headroom for one retry cycle.

Test plan

  • CI passes on the nitro E2E job

Made with Cursor

@vercel

vercelBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d919688

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-16.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.969s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.042s (-3.0%)1.005s (~)0.963s101.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.046s1.005s0.959s101.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.057s1.011s0.954s101.54x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.059s (+1.6%)1.009s (~)0.950s101.59x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.068s (-28.6% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.943s101.84x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.091s (-3.1%)2.005s (~)0.914s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.114s2.007s0.892s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.130s (~)2.006s (~)0.875s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.142s2.010s0.868s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.153s (+0.6%)2.011s (~)0.858s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.162s (+2.0%)2.012s (~)0.850s101.07x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.629s (-2.7%)11.024s (~)0.395s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.789s11.024s0.235s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.859s11.022s0.163s31.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.893s (-0.6%)11.022s (~)0.129s31.02x
💻 LocalNitro10.933s (~)11.023s (~)0.090s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.956s (+0.8%)11.024s (~)0.068s31.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.198s (-5.2% 🟢)15.029s (~)0.830s41.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.529s15.020s0.491s41.02x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.614s (~)15.022s (~)0.408s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.633s15.029s0.396s41.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.734s (+1.0%)15.026s (~)0.292s41.04x
💻 LocalNitro14.940s (-0.8%)15.029s (-6.2% 🟢)0.089s41.05x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)13.830s14.023s0.193s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.110s (+0.7%)14.733s (+1.0%)0.623s71.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.438s (+3.4%)15.028s (+5.0% 🔺)0.589s61.04x
💻 LocalExpress14.790s (-10.9% 🟢)15.028s (-11.8% 🟢)0.238s61.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.111s16.697s0.586s61.16x
💻 LocalNitro16.383s (-2.4%)17.032s (~)0.649s61.18x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.234s2.009s0.776s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.250s (-0.8%)2.009s (~)0.759s151.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.290s (+1.2%)2.012s (~)0.723s151.05x
💻 LocalExpress1.470s (-1.2%)2.005s (~)0.535s151.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.491s2.006s0.515s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.523s (-6.7% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.483s151.23x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.354s (~)3.009s (~)0.654s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.390s (+1.7%)3.013s (~)0.622s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.395s3.009s0.614s101.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.550s (-13.6% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.457s101.08x
💻 LocalNitro2.805s (-10.8% 🟢)3.008s (-22.6% 🟢)0.203s101.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.915s3.344s0.429s91.24x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.472s (~)4.012s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.522s (+1.2%)4.016s (~)0.494s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.637s4.009s0.373s81.05x
💻 LocalExpress6.892s (-17.3% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.321s51.99x
💻 LocalNitro7.538s (-9.7% 🟢)8.023s (-11.1% 🟢)0.485s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.088s8.772s0.684s42.33x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.219s2.010s0.791s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.261s (~)2.009s (~)0.748s151.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.300s (+3.4%)2.011s (~)0.710s151.07x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.512s2.006s0.494s151.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (-15.4% 🟢)2.005s (-14.3% 🟢)0.427s151.29x
💻 LocalExpress1.852s (-2.2%)2.391s (+1.2%)0.539s131.52x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.329s (-0.5%)3.010s (~)0.681s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.381s3.008s0.628s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.389s (+2.1%)3.008s (~)0.619s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.718s (-13.2% 🟢)3.008s (-20.1% 🟢)0.290s101.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.910s3.759s0.849s81.25x
💻 LocalNitro2.912s (-5.0%)3.309s (-14.9% 🟢)0.397s101.25x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.468s (-0.9%)4.011s (~)0.543s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.520s (+1.1%)4.012s (~)0.491s81.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.622s4.012s0.390s81.04x
💻 LocalExpress7.656s (-13.0% 🟢)8.016s (-13.5% 🟢)0.360s42.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)7.748s8.269s0.521s42.23x
💻 LocalNitro7.809s (-14.6% 🟢)8.521s (-15.0% 🟢)0.712s42.25x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.714s (-27.4% 🟢)1.021s (-5.1% 🟢)0.307s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.782s1.023s0.241s591.09x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.833s (-0.7%)1.023s (~)0.190s591.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.851s1.004s0.154s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.860s (+4.8%)1.006s (~)0.146s601.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.012s (+3.2%)1.569s (+43.5% 🔺)0.557s391.42x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.883s2.029s0.146s451.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.958s (-0.9%)2.202s (-2.5%)0.244s411.04x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.104s (+9.2% 🔺)3.010s (+43.3% 🔺)0.906s301.12x
💻 LocalExpress2.243s (-25.6% 🟢)3.007s (-16.1% 🟢)0.764s301.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.041s0.339s301.43x
💻 LocalNitro3.056s (+0.7%)3.842s (+2.2%)0.786s241.62x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)3.851s4.043s0.193s301.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress4.024s (+0.8%)4.603s (+5.4% 🔺)0.579s271.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.339s (+5.7% 🔺)5.013s (+8.9% 🔺)0.674s241.13x
💻 LocalExpress7.236s (-21.4% 🟢)8.015s (-20.0% 🟢)0.779s151.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.693s9.160s0.468s142.26x
💻 LocalNitro8.995s (-3.3%)9.556s (-4.6%)0.561s132.34x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.252s1.007s0.754s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.279s (-1.2%)1.007s (~)0.728s601.11x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.307s (+8.5% 🔺)1.008s (~)0.700s601.22x
💻 LocalNitro0.566s (-6.3% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.438s602.24x
💻 LocalExpress0.583s (+4.0%)1.004s (~)0.421s602.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.606s1.005s0.399s602.40x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.481s (-5.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.525s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.494s1.007s0.513s901.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.536s (+7.9% 🔺)1.007s (~)0.471s901.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.432s (-3.2%)3.008s (~)0.576s305.05x
💻 LocalNitro2.455s (-3.3%)3.008s (~)0.553s305.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.701s3.042s0.341s305.61x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.760s1.006s0.246s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.778s (-4.9%)1.007s (-1.0%)0.229s1201.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.893s (+13.0% 🔺)1.103s (+9.5% 🔺)0.211s1091.18x
💻 LocalExpress10.403s (-7.0% 🟢)11.022s (-7.7% 🟢)0.619s1113.69x
💻 LocalNitro10.671s (-4.6%)11.211s (-3.9%)0.540s1114.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)11.318s11.845s0.527s1114.90x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.139s (-30.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.0% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.876s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.169s1.003s0.012s1.018s0.849s101.22x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.187s1.001s0.002s1.010s0.823s101.35x
💻 LocalNitro0.207s (-3.3%)1.004s (~)0.010s (-19.2% 🟢)1.016s (~)0.809s101.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (+3.5%)0.997s (~)0.001s (-25.0% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.798s101.53x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.227s (+10.9% 🔺)0.996s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.012s (~)0.784s101.64x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.597s1.009s0.004s1.022s0.425s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.600s (-4.8%)1.005s (~)0.011s (+195.1% 🔺)1.028s (~)0.428s591.01x
💻 LocalExpress0.668s (-11.8% 🟢)1.011s (-1.7%)0.009s (~)1.114s (+7.1% 🔺)0.446s551.12x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.678s (+8.6% 🔺)1.021s (+1.4%)0.004s (+6.7% 🔺)1.041s (+1.9%)0.364s581.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.761s1.011s0.010s1.116s0.355s541.28x
💻 LocalNitro0.766s (-8.6% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.009s (-0.5%)1.023s (-8.3% 🟢)0.257s591.28x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.934s1.132s0.000s1.140s0.206s531.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.941s (-2.0%)1.127s (-11.8% 🟢)0.000s (-13.2% 🟢)1.140s (-12.7% 🟢)0.199s531.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.047s (+8.1% 🔺)1.558s (+24.9% 🔺)0.000s (+207.7% 🔺)1.574s (+25.2% 🔺)0.527s391.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.155s (-5.7% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.000s (-20.0% 🟢)2.020s (~)0.865s301.24x
💻 LocalNitro1.217s (~)2.020s (~)0.000s (+200.0% 🔺)2.022s (~)0.805s301.30x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.765s301.35x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.726s (-2.6%)2.198s (+0.9%)0.000s (NaN%)2.245s (+2.1%)0.519s271.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.842s (+2.8%)2.174s (+1.5%)0.000s (+100.0% 🔺)2.188s (+0.6%)0.347s281.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.850s2.146s0.000s2.153s0.303s281.07x
💻 LocalNitro3.439s (+1.5%)3.969s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.975s (-1.5%)0.536s161.99x
💻 LocalExpress3.821s (+10.2% 🔺)4.033s (~)0.000s (-55.4% 🟢)4.393s (+8.8% 🔺)0.572s142.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.826s4.320s0.001s4.324s0.498s142.22x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress18/21
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres17/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production9890671056
✅ 💻 Local Development10660861152
✅ 📦 Local Production10660861152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10660861152
✅ 🪟 Windows960096
✅ 📋 Other270018288
Total455303434896

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro8907
✅ example8907
✅ express8907
✅ fastify8907
✅ hono8907
✅ nextjs-turbopack9402
✅ nextjs-webpack9402
✅ nitro8907
✅ nuxt8907
✅ sveltekit8907
✅ vite8907
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9006
✅ express-stable9006
✅ fastify-stable9006
✅ hono-stable9006
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary77019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9600
✅ nitro-stable9006
✅ nuxt-stable9006
✅ sveltekit-stable9006
✅ vite-stable9006
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9006
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9006

📋 View full workflow run

@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 0ec805a into mainApr 29, 2026
151 of 164 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/bump-test-timeout branch April 29, 2026 19:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karthikscale3@TooTallNate