Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1887 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1887 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1887 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1887 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1887 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1887 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1887 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows - #1887

Merged
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path
May 4, 2026
Merged

ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows#1887
TooTallNate merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The Update existing test comment with stale warning / Update existing benchmark comment with stale warning steps in our two PR-commenting workflows inlined the previous comment body via ${{ steps.get-comment.outputs.previous-results }} into marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment's message: input. As the e2e test matrix and benchmark tables grow, the resulting argv can exceed ARG_MAX and the action fails with Argument list too long.

This was first observed on a feature branch where the matrix had doubled, but the underlying fragility exists at any matrix size as the comment body grows over time.

Fix

Write the rendered stale-banner message to $RUNNER_TEMP/stale-comment.md inside the actions/github-script step and pass the path to sticky-pull-request-comment via its path: input. The action accepts file input identically to inline messages, but with no argv-size limit. Robust to any future matrix size.

Two files, two commits (same refactor applied to each):

  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

The final results-update step in benchmarks.yml already used path: benchmark-summary.md; only the stale-banner step was inlined.

Empty changeset since this is a CI-only change (no published packages affected).

Extracted from PR #1300.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:10
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9e1921c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production10110671078
✅ 💻 Local Development10900861176
✅ 📦 Local Production10900861176
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres10900861176
✅ 🪟 Windows980098
✅ 📋 Other276018294
Total465503434998

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro9107
✅ example9107
✅ express9107
✅ fastify9107
✅ hono9107
✅ nextjs-turbopack9602
✅ nextjs-webpack9602
✅ nitro9107
✅ nuxt9107
✅ sveltekit9107
✅ vite9107
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable9206
✅ express-stable9206
✅ fastify-stable9206
✅ hono-stable9206
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable9800
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary79019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable9800
✅ nitro-stable9206
✅ nuxt-stable9206
✅ sveltekit-stable9206
✅ vite-stable9206
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack9800
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable9206
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable9206

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.037s (-15.6% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.967s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.045s (+3.9%)1.006s (~)0.961s101.20x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.047s1.005s0.958s101.27x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.050s1.011s0.962s101.32x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.060s (-37.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.951s101.60x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.060s (+4.3%)1.011s (~)0.950s101.62x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express1.094s (-2.8%)2.005s (~)0.912s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.112s2.006s0.894s101.02x
💻 LocalNitro1.128s (~)2.006s (~)0.878s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.149s (~)2.011s (~)0.862s101.05x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.163s (+2.0%)2.017s (~)0.854s101.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.206s2.013s0.807s101.10x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.631s (-2.7%)11.022s (~)0.391s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.839s11.024s0.185s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.923s (~)11.023s (~)0.100s31.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.949s (~)11.356s (+3.0%)0.407s31.03x
💻 LocalNitro10.950s (~)11.024s (~)0.073s31.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)11.085s12.019s0.934s31.04x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express14.233s (-4.9%)15.028s (~)0.794s41.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.547s (~)15.024s (~)0.477s41.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro14.665s (~)15.024s (~)0.359s41.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.685s15.029s0.344s41.03x
💻 LocalNitro15.034s (~)15.530s (-3.1%)0.496s41.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)15.239s15.775s0.535s41.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro14.066s (+0.7%)14.880s (+4.0%)0.814s71.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.248s (+1.7%)15.027s (+3.0%)0.780s61.01x
💻 LocalExpress14.794s (-10.9% 🟢)15.027s (-11.8% 🟢)0.232s61.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)16.061s16.697s0.636s61.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)16.440s17.190s0.750s61.17x
💻 LocalNitro16.780s (~)17.031s (~)0.251s61.19x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.254s2.010s0.756s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.269s (~)2.011s (~)0.742s151.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.283s (+1.8%)2.010s (~)0.727s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.451s (-2.5%)2.005s (~)0.554s151.16x
💻 LocalNitro1.514s (-7.2% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.493s151.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.573s2.073s0.500s151.25x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.327s (-1.4%)3.010s (~)0.682s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.345s (~)3.009s (~)0.665s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.579s3.080s0.501s101.11x
💻 LocalExpress2.655s (-10.1% 🟢)3.007s (-12.9% 🟢)0.352s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.841s3.453s0.612s91.22x
💻 LocalNitro2.964s (-5.7% 🟢)3.566s (-8.2% 🟢)0.602s91.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.471s (~)4.011s (~)0.540s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.500s (+0.6%)4.012s (~)0.512s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.176s4.725s0.548s71.20x
💻 LocalExpress6.864s (-17.7% 🟢)7.214s (-20.1% 🟢)0.350s51.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.181s8.771s0.590s42.36x
💻 LocalNitro8.259s (-1.1%)9.020s (~)0.761s42.38x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.264s (+0.6%)2.008s (~)0.744s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.266s (+0.7%)2.009s (~)0.743s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.443s (-23.8% 🟢)2.005s (-15.2% 🟢)0.562s151.14x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.500s2.180s0.680s141.19x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s2.007s0.473s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro1.543s (-17.3% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.462s151.22x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express2.346s (~)3.010s (~)0.664s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.351s (~)3.010s (~)0.660s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.413s3.025s0.611s101.03x
💻 LocalExpress2.666s (-14.9% 🟢)3.007s (-20.1% 🟢)0.341s101.14x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.967s3.564s0.597s91.26x
💻 LocalNitro3.077s (~)3.884s (~)0.807s81.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express3.463s (-1.0%)4.011s (~)0.548s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro3.497s (~)4.012s (~)0.514s81.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.834s4.326s0.491s71.11x
💻 LocalExpress7.506s (-14.7% 🟢)8.017s (-13.5% 🟢)0.511s42.17x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.229s8.518s0.289s42.38x
💻 LocalNitro8.864s (-3.1%)9.030s (-9.9% 🟢)0.166s42.56x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.690s (-29.9% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.314s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.832s (-0.9%)1.023s (~)0.192s591.21x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.835s (+1.8%)1.023s (+1.7%)0.188s591.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.863s1.022s0.159s591.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.964s1.324s0.360s461.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.010s (+3.0%)1.506s (+37.6% 🔺)0.496s401.46x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.965s (-0.6%)2.228s (-1.3%)0.262s411.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro2.014s (+4.5%)2.537s (+20.8% 🔺)0.523s361.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.130s2.578s0.448s361.08x
💻 LocalExpress2.402s (-20.4% 🟢)3.180s (-11.3% 🟢)0.778s291.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.691s3.008s0.318s301.37x
💻 LocalNitro3.032s (~)3.649s (-2.9%)0.616s251.54x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express4.034s (+1.1%)4.626s (+5.9% 🔺)0.592s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.075s4.614s0.539s271.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro4.099s (~)4.665s (+1.3%)0.566s261.02x
💻 LocalExpress7.186s (-22.0% 🟢)7.702s (-23.1% 🟢)0.516s161.78x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)8.674s9.017s0.344s142.15x
💻 LocalNitro9.266s (~)10.019s (~)0.753s122.30x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.281s1.043s0.763s581.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.287s (+1.7%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.287s (+1.4%)1.007s (~)0.720s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.556s (-0.8%)1.004s (~)0.448s601.98x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.565s1.022s0.457s592.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.623s (+3.0%)1.022s (~)0.399s592.22x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.502s (+1.2%)1.007s (~)0.505s901.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.502s (-1.4%)1.007s (~)0.504s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.631s1.190s0.559s761.26x
💻 LocalExpress2.329s (-7.3% 🟢)3.007s (~)0.678s304.64x
💻 LocalNitro2.491s (-1.8%)3.009s (~)0.518s304.96x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.578s3.009s0.431s305.13x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.800s (-2.3%)1.009s (-0.9%)0.208s1191.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.829s (+4.9%)1.010s (~)0.181s1191.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.075s1.581s0.506s771.34x
💻 LocalExpress10.112s (-9.6% 🟢)10.607s (-11.2% 🟢)0.495s1212.64x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.499s11.206s0.708s1113.12x
💻 LocalNitro11.042s (-1.3%)11.483s (-1.6%)0.441s1113.80x
Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.138s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.009s (-22.3% 🟢)1.015s (~)0.878s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.171s1.003s0.013s1.018s0.847s101.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.189s1.000s0.031s1.039s0.850s101.37x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.210s (+2.2%)0.999s (~)0.002s (+6.7% 🔺)1.011s (~)0.802s101.52x
💻 LocalNitro0.214s (~)1.005s (~)0.013s (+5.6% 🔺)1.020s (~)0.806s101.56x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.219s (+6.9% 🔺)0.995s (~)0.002s (-6.3% 🟢)1.011s (~)0.792s101.59x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.617s (-2.1%)1.005s (~)0.004s (+4.4%)1.022s (~)0.405s591.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.655s (+4.9%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.004s (-2.0%)1.040s (+1.7%)0.385s581.06x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.668s1.011s0.010s1.024s0.356s591.08x
💻 LocalNitro0.756s (-9.8% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.010s (+5.5% 🔺)1.024s (-8.2% 🟢)0.268s591.23x
💻 LocalExpress0.775s (+2.3%)1.011s (-1.7%)0.010s (+4.7%)1.227s (+18.0% 🔺)0.453s491.26x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.814s1.246s0.070s1.327s0.513s461.32x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.957s (~)1.220s (-4.6%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)1.233s (-5.6% 🟢)0.276s491.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.989s (+2.1%)1.321s (+5.9% 🔺)0.000s (-47.8% 🟢)1.334s (+6.1% 🔺)0.345s461.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.223s (~)2.021s (~)0.001s (+400.0% 🔺)2.023s (~)0.801s301.28x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.243s2.020s0.000s2.023s0.781s301.30x
💻 LocalExpress1.283s (+4.7%)2.017s (~)0.000s (+7.1% 🔺)2.198s (+8.7% 🔺)0.915s281.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.454s1.810s0.000s1.887s0.433s321.52x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.749s (-1.3%)2.066s (-5.1% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.089s (-5.0% 🟢)0.340s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.755s (-2.0%)2.104s (-1.7%)0.000s (+93.1% 🔺)2.114s (-2.8%)0.358s291.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.153s2.618s0.000s2.651s0.498s231.23x
💻 LocalExpress2.670s (-23.0% 🟢)3.029s (-24.9% 🟢)0.001s (-6.3% 🟢)3.031s (-24.9% 🟢)0.361s201.53x
💻 LocalNitro2.911s (-14.1% 🟢)3.193s (-20.8% 🟢)0.001s (+18.4% 🔺)3.195s (-20.8% 🟢)0.284s191.66x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.966s3.348s0.001s3.351s0.385s191.70x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress19/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres15/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres12/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the CI PR “tests running” sticky comment flow to avoid exceeding runner ARG_MAX by passing the stale-banner content to marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment via a file path instead of an inline message:.

Changes:

  • Renders the stale-banner + previous results into a temp file in the actions/github-script step.
  • Switches the “stale warning” update step to use sticky-pull-request-comment’s path: input.
  • Adds an empty changeset entry to reflect CI-only scope.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
.github/workflows/tests.ymlWrites the stale comment body to disk and passes it via path: to prevent oversized action invocation payloads.
.changeset/pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path.mdAdds an empty changeset (CI-only change).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.github/workflows/tests.yml Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit 059821c into mainMay 4, 2026
340 of 355 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the pr-comment-stale-banner-via-path branch May 4, 2026 04:09
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
…lier-errors-followups
* origin-https/main:
Fix pnpm type issue after tanstack PR (#1907)
ci: pass stale-banner via path: to sticky-pull-request-comment in tests + benchmarks workflows (#1887)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious