Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures - #1936

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions
May 5, 2026
Merged

Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures#1936
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-backport-ai-permissions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Two related issues from the failed backport run on b1fc9adfa (the merge of #1934 itself):

1. Wrong OPENCODE_PERMISSION shape

The value we were passing — {"allow":["*"]} — is not the documented shape for opencode's permission config. The actual schema is keyed by tool/scope name with values "allow" | "ask" | "deny", and a bare string sets every scope at once. So our config was silently falling through to defaults, where external_directory defaults to "ask" — which auto-rejects in non-interactive opencode run. That's why the second run (after the AI Gateway key was rotated) hit:

! permission requested: external_directory (/tmp/*); auto-rejecting
✗ write failed
Error: The user rejected permission to use this specific tool call.

Fix:

  • Set OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"' (the entire permission config = the bare string "allow", allowing every scope including external_directory).
  • Move the decision/diff/prompt files from /tmp/ into the repo working directory (.backport-decision.json, .backport-commit-diff.patch, .backport-decision-prompt.txt), so opencode doesn't need external_directory permission at all. Same fix applied to both AI steps (decision + conflict resolution).

2. AI failures silently masquerading as "no backport"

The first run (with the expired AI Gateway key) emitted Error: AI Gateway authentication failed: Invalid API key but opencode run exited 0 anyway. The workflow then saw the missing decision file, emitted a ::warning::, and defaulted to decision=no — producing a green workflow run that simply didn't backport anything. There was no signal that the AI was completely broken.

Fix: in the Decide whether to backport step, set -euo pipefail and treat any of (a) missing decision file, (b) malformed JSON, or (c) decision value other than yes/no as a hard job failure with ::error:: annotations. A "no backport" outcome now requires AI to explicitly say no.

The conflict-resolution step is unchanged in this regard — it still uses continue-on-error: true because failure to resolve conflicts is an expected outcome that we comment on the source PR for.

The previous `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` value (`{"allow":["*"]}`) was the
wrong shape for opencode's permission config and was silently falling
through to defaults. Notably `external_directory` defaults to "ask",
which auto-rejects in non-interactive `opencode run` — causing the
`write` tool to fail when the AI tried to create the decision file
under `/tmp/`. Use the documented form (`"allow"` as the entire
permission config) and also move the decision/diff/prompt files into
the working directory so opencode doesn't need `external_directory`
permission at all.
Additionally, treat any opencode/AI Gateway failure (auth error,
rejected tool call, missing or malformed decision file) as a hard job
failure rather than silently defaulting to "no backport". A previous
expired AI Gateway key produced a green job that simply skipped the
backport without any indication of the underlying infra problem.
@vercel

vercelBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 07:53
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.031s (-29.3% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.974s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.032s (-26.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.974s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.045s (-53.2% 🟢)1.011s (-3.1%)0.966s101.42x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.050s (-14.0% 🟢)1.012s (~)0.962s101.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.453s (+10.5% 🔺)3.017s (+20.2% 🔺)2.564s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress0.692s (+193.8% 🔺)2.305s (+8.0% 🔺)1.614s101.53x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)1.350s (+436.8% 🔺)3.658s (+56.8% 🔺)2.308s102.98x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.070s (-5.4% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.937s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.071s (-4.8%)2.006s (~)0.935s101.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.080s (-5.8% 🟢)2.010s (~)0.929s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.082s (-5.1% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.927s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express1.546s (-17.5% 🟢)3.755s (-1.4%)2.209s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro1.725s (-55.7% 🟢)3.951s (-33.1% 🟢)2.226s101.12x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.838s (+39.5% 🔺)4.755s (+24.1% 🔺)1.917s101.84x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express10.397s (-4.8%)11.022s (~)0.625s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.411s (-4.2%)11.016s (~)0.605s31.00x
💻 LocalNitro10.441s (-4.6%)11.022s (~)0.580s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.443s (-4.7%)11.018s (~)0.575s31.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express13.229s (-22.1% 🟢)15.006s (-25.0% 🟢)1.777s21.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.383s (-43.6% 🟢)15.676s (-37.6% 🟢)2.293s21.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.505s (-22.0% 🟢)15.207s (-21.6% 🟢)1.702s21.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express13.400s (-8.1% 🟢)14.017s (-6.7% 🟢)0.616s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.436s (-10.2% 🟢)14.027s (-6.7% 🟢)0.591s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.479s (-10.5% 🟢)14.026s (-12.5% 🟢)0.547s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.518s (-7.4% 🟢)14.015s (-6.7% 🟢)0.497s51.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express21.095s (-58.1% 🟢)23.126s (-56.0% 🟢)2.031s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro21.398s (-66.8% 🟢)24.563s (-63.1% 🟢)3.166s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)22.009s (-58.1% 🟢)24.221s (-55.6% 🟢)2.212s31.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express11.830s (-28.7% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.192s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.867s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.150s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.876s (-29.2% 🟢)12.021s (-29.4% 🟢)0.145s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress11.912s (-15.0% 🟢)12.267s (-15.9% 🟢)0.355s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express30.835s (-74.6% 🟢)34.035s (-72.5% 🟢)3.200s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro31.460s (-92.6% 🟢)33.822s (-92.0% 🟢)2.362s31.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)37.531s (-90.5% 🟢)41.183s (-89.6% 🟢)3.652s31.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.137s (-9.8% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.870s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.148s (-9.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.859s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.829s151.03x
💻 LocalNitro1.185s (-27.4% 🟢)2.006s (-3.3%)0.821s151.04x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.396s (-16.2% 🟢)4.009s (-13.3% 🟢)1.612s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.470s (-12.3% 🟢)4.179s (-3.3%)1.708s81.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.295s (+26.4% 🔺)6.760s (+37.1% 🔺)2.465s51.79x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.211s (-48.7% 🟢)2.006s (-33.3% 🟢)0.795s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.219s (-48.1% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.787s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.699s (-42.5% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.306s151.40x
💻 LocalNitro1.783s (-43.3% 🟢)2.006s (-48.4% 🟢)0.223s151.47x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.317s (-18.2% 🟢)5.261s (-11.1% 🟢)1.945s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.892s (+7.5% 🔺)5.926s (+16.0% 🔺)2.034s61.17x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.808s (-32.3% 🟢)6.799s (-23.7% 🟢)1.991s51.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.353s (-61.1% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.655s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.358s (-61.0% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.648s151.00x
💻 LocalExpress5.022s (-39.8% 🟢)5.678s (-37.1% 🟢)0.656s63.71x
💻 LocalNitro5.165s (-38.1% 🟢)5.847s (-35.2% 🟢)0.682s63.82x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.061s (+43.6% 🔺)7.738s (+39.8% 🔺)2.677s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.227s (+23.3% 🔺)7.231s (+18.0% 🔺)2.004s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.067s (-20.7% 🟢)9.230s (-15.8% 🟢)2.162s41.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.158s (-7.9% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.849s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.172s (-6.8% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.837s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.424s (-23.7% 🟢)2.006s (-14.3% 🟢)0.583s151.23x
💻 LocalExpress1.781s (-5.9% 🟢)2.391s (+1.2%)0.610s131.54x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.427s (-1.3%)4.014s (-3.7%)1.587s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.449s (-5.1% 🟢)4.353s (~)1.903s71.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.973s (+35.5% 🔺)5.756s (+24.0% 🔺)1.782s61.64x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.232s (-47.4% 🟢)2.009s (-33.3% 🟢)0.777s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.248s (-46.7% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.761s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.985s (-36.6% 🟢)2.392s (-36.4% 🟢)0.407s131.61x
💻 LocalNitro2.318s (-24.4% 🟢)2.591s (-33.3% 🟢)0.273s121.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.918s (+22.7% 🔺)5.903s (+23.2% 🔺)1.985s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.218s (+30.5% 🔺)6.296s (+24.0% 🔺)2.078s51.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.627s (+47.3% 🔺)6.748s (+49.2% 🔺)2.120s51.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.345s (-61.6% 🟢)2.007s (-50.0% 🟢)0.662s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.365s (-60.8% 🟢)2.008s (-49.9% 🟢)0.643s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress5.170s (-41.2% 🟢)5.679s (-38.8% 🟢)0.509s63.84x
💻 LocalNitro6.330s (-30.8% 🟢)6.815s (-32.0% 🟢)0.485s54.71x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.749s (-26.0% 🟢)7.209s (-11.9% 🟢)2.459s51.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.591s (+9.8% 🔺)7.705s (+13.0% 🔺)2.114s41.18x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.312s (-6.6% 🟢)9.012s (+5.5% 🔺)2.700s41.33x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.442s (-47.4% 🟢)1.006s (-1.7%)0.565s601.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.455s (-53.8% 🟢)1.004s (-6.7% 🟢)0.549s601.03x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.457s (-44.2% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.566s591.04x
💻 LocalNitro0.475s (-51.5% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.529s601.08x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express4.736s (-75.1% 🟢)6.800s (-68.1% 🟢)2.064s91.00x
▲ VercelNitro5.336s (-75.8% 🟢)7.190s (-70.1% 🟢)1.854s91.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)7.335s (-49.4% 🟢)9.729s (-39.5% 🟢)2.394s71.55x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.057s (-46.5% 🟢)1.558s (-31.0% 🟢)0.501s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.062s (-44.9% 🟢)1.576s (-25.0% 🟢)0.513s581.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.164s (-61.4% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.842s451.10x
💻 LocalNitro1.193s (-60.7% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.813s451.13x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express12.635s (-63.4% 🟢)14.956s (-59.4% 🟢)2.321s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro13.248s (-66.4% 🟢)15.515s (-62.4% 🟢)2.267s61.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)16.063s (-67.7% 🟢)18.703s (-63.8% 🟢)2.640s51.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.997s (-51.3% 🟢)2.360s (-48.7% 🟢)0.363s511.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.038s (-48.9% 🟢)2.427s (-44.4% 🟢)0.389s501.02x
💻 LocalExpress2.673s (-71.0% 🟢)3.032s (-69.7% 🟢)0.359s401.34x
💻 LocalNitro2.674s (-71.2% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.333s401.34x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express40.689s (-68.7% 🟢)42.823s (-67.6% 🟢)2.134s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro40.966s (-57.7% 🟢)43.759s (-55.5% 🟢)2.793s31.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)49.959s (-53.4% 🟢)53.891s (-50.5% 🟢)3.932s31.23x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.177s (-37.2% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.828s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.180s (-36.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.826s601.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.418s (-30.9% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.586s602.36x
💻 LocalExpress0.452s (-19.4% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.552s602.55x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.103s (+7.6% 🔺)4.520s (+24.3% 🔺)2.416s141.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.617s (+57.5% 🔺)4.634s (+38.3% 🔺)2.017s131.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.643s (+80.1% 🔺)5.626s (+48.3% 🔺)1.984s111.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.302s (-40.8% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.704s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.314s (-36.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.692s901.04x
💻 LocalExpress2.157s (-14.2% 🟢)2.852s (-5.2% 🟢)0.695s327.15x
💻 LocalNitro2.188s (-13.8% 🟢)2.944s (-2.2%)0.755s317.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro7.066s (+119.0% 🔺)8.963s (+85.9% 🔺)1.898s111.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.038s (+127.4% 🔺)10.362s (+99.5% 🔺)2.323s91.14x
▲ VercelExpress9.247s (+203.5% 🔺)11.387s (+136.9% 🔺)2.141s81.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.623s (-23.9% 🟢)1.006s (-1.2%)0.382s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.628s (-20.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.377s1201.01x
💻 LocalExpress9.801s (-12.4% 🟢)10.446s (-12.5% 🟢)0.645s1215.72x
💻 LocalNitro9.989s (-10.7% 🟢)10.526s (-9.8% 🟢)0.537s1216.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)19.808s (+91.8% 🔺)21.856s (+77.9% 🔺)2.048s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress21.216s (+185.9% 🔺)23.450s (+153.7% 🔺)2.234s61.07x
▲ VercelNitro25.423s (+229.2% 🔺)27.490s (+192.4% 🔺)2.067s51.28x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.132s (+429.5% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.013s (~)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.888s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.133s (+468.8% 🔺)2.004s (+99.5% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.1% 🔺)0.885s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.138s (+455.3% 🔺)1.996s (+99.7% 🔺)0.001s (-6.7% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.139s (+455.1% 🔺)1.998s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-37.5% 🟢)2.009s (+98.7% 🔺)0.871s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.357s (-38.5% 🟢)3.819s (-27.6% 🟢)2.736s (+268.6% 🔺)7.039s (+8.6% 🔺)4.682s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.918s (+16.5% 🔺)4.205s (+2.8%)13.622s (+1317.8% 🔺)18.510s (+231.1% 🔺)15.592s101.24x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.219s (-38.4% 🟢)4.497s (-48.0% 🟢)0.896s (+41.8% 🔺)7.628s (-22.1% 🟢)3.409s101.79x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.494s (+137.2% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (+2.7%)2.024s (+97.8% 🔺)0.530s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.505s (+141.1% 🔺)2.002s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-5.7% 🟢)2.024s (+98.0% 🔺)0.519s301.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.512s (+99.8% 🔺)2.012s (+95.5% 🔺)0.009s (-4.4%)2.023s (+94.5% 🔺)0.510s301.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.532s (+82.6% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.011s (+12.4% 🔺)2.024s (+81.3% 🔺)0.492s301.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.860s (-80.1% 🟢)7.388s (-76.0% 🟢)0.285s (+154.6% 🔺)8.178s (-74.3% 🟢)2.318s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress6.313s (-2.9%)8.571s (+7.0% 🔺)0.391s (-4.2%)9.506s (+7.6% 🔺)3.193s71.08x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)12.561s (-25.8% 🟢)13.711s (-24.8% 🟢)0.157s (-25.8% 🟢)15.138s (-20.1% 🟢)2.577s42.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express0.679s (-29.4% 🟢)1.050s (-17.8% 🟢)0.000s (-59.6% 🟢)1.067s (-18.3% 🟢)0.388s571.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.680s (-29.8% 🟢)1.046s (-16.2% 🟢)0.000s (-57.9% 🟢)1.059s (-15.8% 🟢)0.379s571.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.349s (+10.4% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.668s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.370s (+11.8% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (-40.0% 🟢)2.017s (~)0.647s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.477s (+14.0% 🔺)5.054s (+15.0% 🔺)0.000s (+136.4% 🔺)5.538s (+15.2% 🔺)2.061s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress3.935s (+5.2% 🔺)5.392s (+5.7% 🔺)0.025s (+13375.0% 🔺)6.007s (+8.6% 🔺)2.072s101.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.868s (-42.4% 🟢)6.741s (-41.5% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.362s (-30.6% 🟢)2.494s81.69x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.249s (-30.3% 🟢)1.930s (-9.9% 🟢)0.000s (+171.0% 🔺)1.979s (-9.0% 🟢)0.730s311.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.272s (-28.2% 🟢)2.065s (-5.2% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.114s (-3.9%)0.842s291.02x
💻 LocalExpress3.051s (-12.0% 🟢)3.734s (-7.4% 🟢)0.001s (+2.9%)3.737s (-7.4% 🟢)0.686s172.44x
💻 LocalNitro3.163s (-6.6% 🟢)3.965s (-1.7%)0.000s (-53.1% 🟢)3.968s (-1.7%)0.805s162.53x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express5.513s (+20.2% 🔺)7.347s (+22.0% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)8.077s (+25.1% 🔺)2.563s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.230s (+52.2% 🔺)7.757s (+44.3% 🔺)0.000s (-54.2% 🟢)8.221s (+41.9% 🔺)1.991s81.13x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)8.815s (+56.9% 🔺)9.757s (+39.7% 🔺)0.000s (+33.3% 🔺)11.223s (+48.8% 🔺)2.408s61.60x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress16/21
🐘 PostgresExpress14/21
▲ VercelExpress12/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres16/21
Next.js (Turbopack)▲ Vercel21/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 194042f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production92502191144
✅ 💻 Local Development123702191456
✅ 📦 Local Production123702191456
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres123702191456
✅ 🪟 Windows10400104
✅ 📋 Other5520176728
Total5292010526344

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro78026
✅ example78026
✅ express78026
✅ fastify78026
✅ hono78026
✅ nextjs-turbopack10202
✅ nextjs-webpack10202
✅ nitro78026
✅ nuxt78026
✅ sveltekit9707
✅ vite78026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable79025
✅ express-stable79025
✅ fastify-stable79025
✅ hono-stable79025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary85019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled10400
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled10400
✅ nitro-stable79025
✅ nuxt-stable79025
✅ sveltekit-stable9806
✅ vite-stable79025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack10400
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable79025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-79025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start78026

📋 View full workflow run

@TooTallNate
TooTallNate merged commit e8ea90d into mainMay 5, 2026
115 of 116 checks passed
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix-backport-ai-permissions branch May 5, 2026 07:57

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR hardens the automated stable backport workflow after failed runs showed that opencode permissions were misconfigured and AI decision failures could be silently treated as “no backport”. It updates the GitHub Actions workflow that decides whether a merged main commit should be backported and, when needed, uses AI to help resolve cherry-pick conflicts.

Changes:

  • Fixes the OPENCODE_PERMISSION value used by the AI-backed backport steps.
  • Moves the AI decision artifacts into the repo working directory and makes missing/invalid AI decision output fail the job.
  • Keeps the conflict-resolution AI step aligned with the updated opencode permission configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +209 to +223
git show --format='' "$SHA" > .backport-commit-diff.patch
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < .backport-commit-diff.patch)
MAX_DIFF_BYTES=200000
if [ "$DIFF_SIZE" -gt "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" ]; then
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" /tmp/commit-diff.patch > /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv /tmp/commit-diff-truncated.patch /tmp/commit-diff.patch
head -c "$MAX_DIFF_BYTES" .backport-commit-diff.patch > .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
echo "[... diff truncated at ${MAX_DIFF_BYTES} bytes; full size was ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes ...]" >> .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch
mv .backport-commit-diff-truncated.patch .backport-commit-diff.patch
fi

# Decision file lives inside the working directory for the same
# reason: opencode's `write` tool treats anything outside its cwd as
# an `external_directory` access, which auto-rejects in headless
# mode unless explicitly allowed.
DECISION_FILE=".backport-decision.json"
Comment on lines +311 to +316
DECISION=$(jq -r '.decision' "$DECISION_FILE")
REASONING=$(jq -r '.reasoning' "$DECISION_FILE")

if [ "$DECISION" != "yes" ] && [ "$DECISION" != "no" ]; then
echo "::warning::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION'; defaulting to no backport."
DECISION="no"
REASONING="AI returned an unrecognized decision value. Original reasoning: $REASONING"
echo "::error::AI returned invalid decision '$DECISION' (expected 'yes' or 'no'). Reasoning: $REASONING"
exit 1
Comment on lines +174 to +179
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. The value is the
# entire `permission` config (see https://opencode.ai/docs/permissions/);
# the bare string "allow" applies allow-everything to every scope,
# including `external_directory` (which defaults to "ask" and would
# otherwise auto-reject in non-interactive `opencode run`).
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
Comment on lines +428 to +430
# Allow opencode tools to run without prompting. See the matching
# comment on the `Decide whether to backport` step for details.
OPENCODE_PERMISSION: '"allow"'
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for e8ea90d (AI decision).

This commit only modifies .github/workflows/backport.yml, which is release/CI plumbing for the backport workflow itself. The backport workflow runs against main to create PRs targeting stable, so fixes to it don't need to live on the stable branch.

To override, add the backport-stable label to this PR.

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* origin/main:
feat: serializable AbortController/AbortSignal (#1301)
Auto-remove workflow packages from serverExternalPackages (#1481)
Add missing changeset for Zod 4.4.x compatibility fix in @workflow/world (#1939)
Push backport branch via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch for signed commits (#1937)
Fix backport workflow opencode permission and surface AI failures (#1936)
Restructure backport workflow with AI-driven decisions (#1934)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate