Skip to content

[docs] Document WORKFLOW_SEQUENTIAL_REPLAYS on the v4 Vercel World page - #2875

Closed
VaguelySerious wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
peter/document-runtime-env-vars
Closed

[docs] Document WORKFLOW_SEQUENTIAL_REPLAYS on the v4 Vercel World page#2875
VaguelySerious wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
peter/document-runtime-env-vars

Conversation

@VaguelySerious

@VaguelySeriousVaguelySerious commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why

Docs-only; empty changeset included.

Docs Preview

Pagev4
Vercel World — WORKFLOW_SEQUENTIAL_REPLAYS/docs/deploying/world/vercel-world#workflow_sequential_replays

(Preview is behind deployment protection — requires Vercel team access.)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The flag ships on the 4.x stable line (#2193), but the docs
site deploys from main — without this page the variable is undiscoverable.
Covers the build+runtime requirement, the 2x per-delivery billing under
maxConcurrency, topic-cardinality/latency costs, and the SDK-only
serialization boundary. WORKFLOW_INLINE_OWNERSHIP and
WORKFLOW_INLINE_OWNERSHIP_LEASE_SECONDS are already documented on the v5
Runtime Tuning page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5e82629

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@VaguelySerious
VaguelySerious deleted the peter/document-runtime-env-vars branch July 10, 2026 18:59
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@VaguelySerious