Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
filesystems: include more remote fs types, pass them to fsck - #10
filesystems: include more remote fs types, pass them to fsck#10CameronNemo wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Vaelatern
commented
Oct 3, 2018
Can't many of these also be local filesystems? |
Vaelatern
commented
Oct 3, 2018
And I don't like the change to fsck -- why? |
CameronNemo
commented
Oct 3, 2018
Which ones could be local filesystems? I'm not sure how GlusterFS, or Ceph, could be available that early in the boot sequence. The list was gathered from systemd source code, mountall (Upstart mount helper) source code, and Debian init scripts. As for the fsck change: I thought it would be best if the fsck and mount commands operate on the same mountpoints and with the same information. Anything less might produce inconsistent results. Is a fsck even useful for remote filesystems? |
Vaelatern
commented
Oct 3, 2018
If gluster is started in the ramdisk for some reason, it could very well be running at that point. |
CameronNemo
commented
Jan 2, 2019
From what I have seen while digging through dracut, they fsck themselves before mounting anything (typically / or maybe /usr). |
No description provided.