Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183

Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
torgo-patch-1

Conversation

@torgo

@torgotorgo commented Jul 23, 2026•
edited by pr-preview Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.

Open issues on this PR:

  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?

Preview | Diff

@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo requested a review from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober

hober commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297

brentzundel
brentzundel reviewed Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs Outdated
@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal reviewed Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs Outdated
@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal reviewed Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs Outdated
@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal added this to the Process Next milestone Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober merged commit f92ce2c into mainAug 26, 2026
4 checks passed
@frivoalfrivoal added the Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion label Aug 26, 2026
@torgo

torgo commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

woo!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes
+1 more reviewer
@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects

None yet

Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183
Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Conversation
@torgo
@torgotorgo
commented
Jul 23, 2026•

edited by pr-preview
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.
Open issues on this PR:
  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?
Preview | Diff
@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo
requested a review
from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober
hober
commented
Aug 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297
brentzundel
brentzundel
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal
added this to the Process Next milestone
Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober
merged commit f92ce2c
into
mainAug 26, 2026

4 checks passed

@frivoalfrivoal
added
the 
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
label
Aug 26, 2026
@torgo
torgo
commented
Aug 26, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
woo!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects


None yet


Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183
Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Conversation
@torgo
@torgotorgo
commented
Jul 23, 2026•

edited by pr-preview
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.
Open issues on this PR:
  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?
Preview | Diff
@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo
requested a review
from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober
hober
commented
Aug 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297
brentzundel
brentzundel
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal
added this to the Process Next milestone
Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober
merged commit f92ce2c
into
mainAug 26, 2026

4 checks passed

@frivoalfrivoal
added
the 
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
label
Aug 26, 2026
@torgo
torgo
commented
Aug 26, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
woo!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects


None yet


Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183
Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Conversation
@torgo
@torgotorgo
commented
Jul 23, 2026•

edited by pr-preview
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.
Open issues on this PR:
  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?
Preview | Diff
@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo
requested a review
from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober
hober
commented
Aug 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297
brentzundel
brentzundel
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal
added this to the Process Next milestone
Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober
merged commit f92ce2c
into
mainAug 26, 2026

4 checks passed

@frivoalfrivoal
added
the 
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
label
Aug 26, 2026
@torgo
torgo
commented
Aug 26, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
woo!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects


None yet


Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183
Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Conversation
@torgo
@torgotorgo
commented
Jul 23, 2026•

edited by pr-preview
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.
Open issues on this PR:
  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?
Preview | Diff
@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo
requested a review
from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober
hober
commented
Aug 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297
brentzundel
brentzundel
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal
added this to the Process Next milestone
Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober
merged commit f92ce2c
into
mainAug 26, 2026

4 checks passed

@frivoalfrivoal
added
the 
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
label
Aug 26, 2026
@torgo
torgo
commented
Aug 26, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
woo!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects


None yet


Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183
Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Conversation
@torgo
@torgotorgo
commented
Jul 23, 2026•

edited by pr-preview
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.
Open issues on this PR:
  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?
Preview | Diff
@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo
requested a review
from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober
hober
commented
Aug 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297
brentzundel
brentzundel
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal
added this to the Process Next milestone
Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober
merged commit f92ce2c
into
mainAug 26, 2026

4 checks passed

@frivoalfrivoal
added
the 
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
label
Aug 26, 2026
@torgo
torgo
commented
Aug 26, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
woo!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects


None yet


Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183
Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Conversation
@torgo
@torgotorgo
commented
Jul 23, 2026•

edited by pr-preview
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.
Open issues on this PR:
  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?
Preview | Diff
@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo
requested a review
from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober
hober
commented
Aug 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297
brentzundel
brentzundel
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal
added this to the Process Next milestone
Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober
merged commit f92ce2c
into
mainAug 26, 2026

4 checks passed

@frivoalfrivoal
added
the 
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
label
Aug 26, 2026
@torgo
torgo
commented
Aug 26, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
woo!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects


None yet


Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process - #1183
Merged
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Aug 26, 2026
Merged
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process#1183
hober merged 4 commits into
mainfrom 
torgo-patch-1
Conversation
@torgo
@torgotorgo
commented
Jul 23, 2026•

edited by pr-preview
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182. This is my first PR on the Process so please bear with me if the formatting is not what it should be.
Open issues on this PR:
  • The current wording of the combined text says that the chair MUST be selected from the group in question, but this is not the case for the AB, so should this must actually be a SHOULD (opening up the possibility of an external chair for the TAG as well) or should there be separate language in here for TAG and AB?
  • The AB chair selection process includes a separate ratification step by secret ballot: "Upon appointment, the Chair(s) are subject to ratification by secret ballot, requiring approval by two thirds of the elected participants." Should this be a part of the combined text, or do we leave it to each group to develop their own agreed way to measure the consensus decision?
Preview | Diff
@torgo
Refine Advisory Board and TAG chair selection process
c982e56
Removed redundant text regarding Advisory Board Chair selection and clarified the appointment process for Staff Contact. As per #1182.
@torgo
torgo
requested a review
from frivoalJuly 23, 2026 16:12
@hober
hober
commented
Aug 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/297
brentzundel
brentzundel
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@torgo@brentzundel
Apply suggestion from@brentzundel
944a96f
Co-authored-by: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
08cb1ae
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
frivoal
frivoal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadindex.bs
Outdated

@hober@frivoal
Apply suggestion from@frivoal
1895a32
Co-authored-by: Florian Rivoal <git@florian.rivoal.net>
@frivoalfrivoal
added this to the Process Next milestone
Aug 26, 2026
@hober
hober
merged commit f92ce2c
into
mainAug 26, 2026

4 checks passed

@frivoalfrivoal
added
the 
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
label
Aug 26, 2026
@torgo
torgo
commented
Aug 26, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
woo!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@frivoalfrivoalfrivoal left review comments
@hoberhoberhober approved these changes
@brentzundelbrentzundelbrentzundel approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@nasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmdnasmiya1940-cmd approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects


None yet


Milestone

Process Next

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@torgo@hober@frivoal@brentzundel@nasmiya1940-cmd