Existing proposals
Problem
Agent Zero needs a trustworthy first milestone for handling pull-request review feedback. Today the project direction exists at roadmap level, but the implementation work needs a focused issue that defines the complete feedback-to-verification loop without treating reviewer claims as automatically correct.
Parent roadmap: #5
Desired outcome
Deliver the v0.1 workflow where Agent Zero can ingest GitHub PR review feedback, validate whether a finding is supported, apply narrowly scoped changes through the runner boundary when authorized, run repository-native checks, and publish deterministic evidence for accepted or rejected findings.
Acceptance goals:
- ingest GitHub pull-request review comments and requested changes
- distinguish actionable feedback from incorrect or unsupported claims
- implement the discover → understand → validate → plan → execute → verify → review lifecycle
- preserve evidence for accepted and rejected findings
- apply narrow fixes only through the runner boundary
- run repository-native lint, typecheck, test, and build checks
- report verification results through GitHub Checks
- enforce repair budgets and deterministic terminal states
- complete isolated production runner support
Likely area
Agent runtime
Safety and compatibility
High impact. This milestone affects repository mutation, command execution, observe/fix authorization, GitHub event handling, and verification guarantees. observe must remain read-only. Production execution must remain behind an isolated runner boundary, and failed verification must never be presented as success.
Alternatives considered
Implementing only a patch-generation loop was rejected because it would not satisfy Agent Zero's find, fix, and verify principle. Treating reviewer feedback as trusted input was also rejected because both human and AI review comments can be incorrect.
Existing proposals
Problem
Agent Zero needs a trustworthy first milestone for handling pull-request review feedback. Today the project direction exists at roadmap level, but the implementation work needs a focused issue that defines the complete feedback-to-verification loop without treating reviewer claims as automatically correct.
Parent roadmap: #5
Desired outcome
Deliver the v0.1 workflow where Agent Zero can ingest GitHub PR review feedback, validate whether a finding is supported, apply narrowly scoped changes through the runner boundary when authorized, run repository-native checks, and publish deterministic evidence for accepted or rejected findings.
Acceptance goals:
Likely area
Agent runtime
Safety and compatibility
High impact. This milestone affects repository mutation, command execution, observe/fix authorization, GitHub event handling, and verification guarantees.
observemust remain read-only. Production execution must remain behind an isolated runner boundary, and failed verification must never be presented as success.Alternatives considered
Implementing only a patch-generation loop was rejected because it would not satisfy Agent Zero's find, fix, and verify principle. Treating reviewer feedback as trusted input was also rejected because both human and AI review comments can be incorrect.