build riscv64 wheel

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.

[ffgan]

PyPI recently added support for riscv64(rv64) wheel packages, so we can consider adding rv64 support for python-xmlsec.

Below are the CI results:
Wheel build

The results are generally well presented.

---

Other Info
Co-authored by: nijincheng@iscas.ac.cn;

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for building riscv64 wheels for python-xmlsec. PyPI has recently added support for riscv64 wheel packages, and this change enables the project to build and distribute wheels for this architecture.

• Adds riscv64 to the list of supported architectures in the cibuildwheel configuration
• Implements a workaround for an OpenSSL assembly code issue on riscv64 by adding the no-asm flag
• Updates dependency versions (cibuildwheel, ruff, setuptools, lxml) to support the new build requirements

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
setup.py	Adds riscv64-specific OpenSSL build configuration with no-asm flag to work around assembly code relocation issues; moves import statement
pyproject.toml	Adds riscv64 to supported Linux architectures, pins setuptools and lxml versions, skips musllinux_riscv64 builds, adds setuptools_scm configuration
.github/workflows/wheels.yml	Updates cibuildwheel version from 2.21.3 to 3.1.4
requirements-test.txt	Updates ruff version from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0
doc/source/requirements.txt	Pins lxml version to 6.0.2

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ffgan]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

[mxamin]

The CI failure is a network issue; just retry it. This problem might occur a bit frequently here. Perhaps we could consider putting these required dependencies in a separate repository and pulling from that repository when needed. This way we can avoid network issues caused by accessing other websites.

You're right, the failure is because of a network issue. I'm planning to fix the dependencies to a specific version and put them all in a separate repository as we did for Windows builds before releasing the next version.

[ffgan]

Hello maintainer @mxamin , could you please consider releasing a new version to provide available rv64 wheels on PyPI?

[mxamin]

@ffgan Sure! I was planning to do that soon. Probably next week, or maybe earlier if I find some spare time.