Skip to content

doc: clarification on key handling - #1492

Merged
MauroToscano merged 4 commits into
stagingfrom
doc/key_handling
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

doc: clarification on key handling#1492
MauroToscano merged 4 commits into
stagingfrom
doc/key_handling

Conversation

@Oppen

@OppenOppen commented Nov 26, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

TITLE

Description

Description of the pull request changes and motivation.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • Optimization
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • “Hotfix” to testnet, everything else to staging
  • Linked to Github Issue
  • This change depends on code or research by an external entity
    • Acknowledgements were updated to give credit
  • Unit tests added
  • This change requires new documentation.
    • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • This change is an Optimization
    • Benchmarks added/run
  • Has a known issue
  • If your PR changes the Operator compatibility (Ex: Upgrade prover versions)
    • This PR adds compatibility for operator for both versions and do not change batcher/docs/examples
    • This PR updates batcher and docs/examples to the newer version. This requires the operator are already updated to be compatible

MarcosNicolau
MarcosNicolau approved these changes Nov 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
Comment threaddocs/operator_guides/0_running_an_operator.md
MauroToscano
MauroToscano reviewed Nov 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
Comment threaddocs/operator_guides/0_running_an_operator.md Outdated
@MauroToscano
MauroToscano merged commit bd6edd9 into stagingNov 27, 2024
@MauroToscano
MauroToscano deleted the doc/key_handling branch November 27, 2024 14:17
avilagaston9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
@Oppen@MauroToscano@avilagaston9
doc: clarification on key handling (#1492)
e603277
Co-authored-by: Mauro Toscano <12560266+MauroToscano@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@MauroToscanoMauroToscanoMauroToscano approved these changes
@MarcosNicolauMarcosNicolauMarcosNicolau approved these changes
+3 more reviewers
@PatStilesPatStilesPatStiles approved these changes
@uri-99uri-99uri-99 approved these changes
@avilagaston9avilagaston9avilagaston9 approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@Oppen@MauroToscano@PatStiles@uri-99@avilagaston9@MarcosNicolau