Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade - #1864

Closed
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b
Closed

Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade#1864
jhamman wants to merge 7 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
jhamman:chore/ruff-isort-v3b

Conversation

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#1841
Closes#1862

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhammanjhamman changed the title Chore/ruff isort v3bConfigure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgradeMay 11, 2024
@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

DimitriPapadopoulos commented May 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 24.4.2
hooks:
- id: black

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

@DimitriPapadopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

Comment threadpyproject.toml
"docs"
"docs",
"src/zarr/v2/",
"tests/v2/"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

)

@lru_cache
@lru_cache # noqa: B019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

@normanrz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #1890

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jhamman@DimitriPapadopoulos@normanrz@sanketverma1704