Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Accept dictionaries for store argument - #2164

Merged
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Accept dictionaries for store argument#2164
jhamman merged 3 commits into
zarr-developers:v3from
TomAugspurger:feature/dict-store

Conversation

@TomAugspurger

@TomAugspurgerTomAugspurger commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates how we handle a plain dictionary provided to open_group and friends so that the following works:

group = await zarr.api.asynchronous.open_group(store={}, mode="w")

The dictionary is interpreted as the store_dict argument of zarr.store.MemoryStore. This effectively mirrors the behavior of zarr-python v2, and I think doesn't introduce an ambiguity. Previously a TypeError was raised.

This change will make it slightly easier to get xarray's test suite running with zarr v3.

TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

@jhamman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After thinking a bit more about this, I'm a bit concerned that we may not be ready for a generic MutableMapping in the MemoryStore. What would happen if we tossed a zict.LMDB into the constructor? I suspect things would mostly work but maybe not?

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure how much faith to put in it, but the fact that mypy allows it gives me some comfort.

@d-v-b

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If we accept anything that implements MutableMapping here, then there's no guarantee that the store is actually in memory, since the __getitem__ and __setitem__ operations could be running arbitrary IO-ful code. This seems fine with me, as long as users know what they are getting into, and maybe a useful bridge for users who want some v2-style store behavior (but maybe a better name for the store would be MutableMappingStore?)

@TomAugspurger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ah, I see, the concern is specifically around the isinstance at https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/pull/2164/files#diff-9a2583a58394683284176a2d2db4df1e8ffafce4f34edc7a176c625863815518R99.

In that case, yes, I think we should narrow it to just accept dictionaries, where there's no ambiguity about whether a MemoryStore is appropriate.

@jhamman
jhamman merged commit c62294e into zarr-developers:v3Sep 12, 2024
dcherian added a commit to dcherian/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
* v3:
fix: opening a group with unspecified format finds either v2 or v3 (zarr-developers#2183)
test: check that store, array, and group classes are serializable (zarr-developers#2006)
feature(store): V3 ZipStore (zarr-developers#2078)
More typing fixes for tests (zarr-developers#2173)
refactor: split metadata into v2 and v3 modules (zarr-developers#2163)
Accept dictionaries for `store` argument (zarr-developers#2164)
Simplify mypy config for tests (zarr-developers#2156)
Fixed path segment duplication in open_array (zarr-developers#2167)
Fixed test warnings (zarr-developers#2168)
chore: update pre-commit hooks (zarr-developers#2165)
Ensure that store_dict used for empty dicts (zarr-developers#2162)
Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 in the actions group (zarr-developers#2160)
dstansby pushed a commit to dstansby/zarr-python that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
* Accept dictionaries for `store`
* fixup doc build warnings
* Only support dictionaries
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TomAugspurger@jhamman@d-v-b