docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622

Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/omit-not-security

Conversation

@ymc9

@ymc9ymc9 commented Jul 2, 2026•
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.

Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.

@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 2, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md

Walkthrough

Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.

Changes

Omit documentation update

Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ymc9
ymc9 merged commit 2e962c9 into mainJul 2, 2026
4 checks passed
@ymc9
ymc9 deleted the docs/omit-not-security branch July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit to sanny-io/zenstack-docs that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622
Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Conversation
@ymc9
@ymc9ymc9
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.
Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.
@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm
Request Review
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md
Walkthrough
Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.
Changes
Omit documentation update
Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@ymc9
ymc9
merged commit 2e962c9
into
mainJul 2, 2026

4 checks passed

@ymc9
ymc9
deleted the

docs/omit-not-security

branch
July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit
to sanny-io/zenstack-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622
Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Conversation
@ymc9
@ymc9ymc9
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.
Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.
@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm
Request Review
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md
Walkthrough
Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.
Changes
Omit documentation update
Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@ymc9
ymc9
merged commit 2e962c9
into
mainJul 2, 2026

4 checks passed

@ymc9
ymc9
deleted the

docs/omit-not-security

branch
July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit
to sanny-io/zenstack-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622
Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Conversation
@ymc9
@ymc9ymc9
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.
Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.
@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm
Request Review
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md
Walkthrough
Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.
Changes
Omit documentation update
Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@ymc9
ymc9
merged commit 2e962c9
into
mainJul 2, 2026

4 checks passed

@ymc9
ymc9
deleted the

docs/omit-not-security

branch
July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit
to sanny-io/zenstack-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622
Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Conversation
@ymc9
@ymc9ymc9
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.
Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.
@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm
Request Review
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md
Walkthrough
Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.
Changes
Omit documentation update
Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@ymc9
ymc9
merged commit 2e962c9
into
mainJul 2, 2026

4 checks passed

@ymc9
ymc9
deleted the

docs/omit-not-security

branch
July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit
to sanny-io/zenstack-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622
Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Conversation
@ymc9
@ymc9ymc9
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.
Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.
@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm
Request Review
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md
Walkthrough
Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.
Changes
Omit documentation update
Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@ymc9
ymc9
merged commit 2e962c9
into
mainJul 2, 2026

4 checks passed

@ymc9
ymc9
deleted the

docs/omit-not-security

branch
July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit
to sanny-io/zenstack-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622
Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Conversation
@ymc9
@ymc9ymc9
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.
Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.
@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm
Request Review
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md
Walkthrough
Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.
Changes
Omit documentation update
Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@ymc9
ymc9
merged commit 2e962c9
into
mainJul 2, 2026

4 checks passed

@ymc9
ymc9
deleted the

docs/omit-not-security

branch
July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit
to sanny-io/zenstack-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature - #622
Merged
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature#622
ymc9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
docs/omit-not-security
Conversation
@ymc9
@ymc9ymc9
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Adds a warning callout to the omit docs clarifying that the omit feature (at all three layers — schema, client, and query) is not a security feature, but rather a convenient way to control the default set of fields returned during a query. Readers are pointed to access policies for protecting sensitive data.
Also removes the "for security reasons" phrasing from the allowQueryTimeOmitOverride section to stay consistent with this framing.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • Documentation
    • Clarified that omit settings are not a security feature and should not be used to protect sensitive data.
    • Updated guidance on query-time omit overrides to better explain when always-hidden fields should remain omitted.
@ymc9@claude
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature
3d24380
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
vercelBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
zenstack-new-siteReadyReadyPreview, CommentJul 2, 2026 10:00pm
Request Review
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 2, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Review Change Stack
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ea7516-a91c-4b51-885e-f7d2adc68df8
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1594db2 and 3d24380.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/orm/api/omit.md
Walkthrough
Documentation update to the omit configuration page adding a warning that omit is not a security mechanism and recommending access policies instead, plus revised wording describing scenarios for disabling query-time omit overrides.
Changes
Omit documentation update
Layer / File(s)Summary
Security warning and override wording
docs/orm/api/omit.md		Adds a warning callout clarifying omit is not a security feature and revises wording on disabling query-time omit overrides via allowQueryTimeOmitOverride.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main documentation change: clarifying that omit is not a security feature.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch docs/omit-not-security
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@ymc9
ymc9
merged commit 2e962c9
into
mainJul 2, 2026

4 checks passed

@ymc9
ymc9
deleted the

docs/omit-not-security

branch
July 2, 2026 22:06
sanny-io pushed a commit
to sanny-io/zenstack-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2026
@ymc9@claude@sanny-io
docs: clarify omit is not a security feature (zenstackhq#622)
bfc98b9
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ymc9