🧪 add test for redact_ndjson_lines in log_redactor - #20
Conversation
Co-authored-by: zrt219 <199104500+zrt219@users.noreply.github.com>
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
🎯 What: The
redact_ndjson_linesgenerator function inlog_redactor.pywas untesteed. This PR addresses that testing gap.📊 Coverage: Tests the iteration of lines (NDJSON logs) that go through
redact_ndjson_lines, including preserving the order of generated logs and ignoring blank lines. Tests the batching capabilities and validates that the JSON parsing/serialization works correctly with specific message fields.✨ Result: Better confidence in the implementation of the generator, expanding the test coverage for the
log_redactorintegration.PR created automatically by Jules for task 13646470839647820395 started by @zrt219