issues: clarify #250 waves do not outrank A1 acuity - #1632
Conversation
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in:42 minutes Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR updates two documentation ledgers. It adds and reorders branch-review records, then updates issue ChangesDocumentation ledgers
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Comment |
BigSimmo
commented
Aug 5, 2026
…ity-clarify-3121 Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…ity-clarify-3121 Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…ity-clarify-3121 Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
#250so multi-wave packaging is the engineering track only and does not outrank recommended-queue A1 acuity (#059/#053/#231/#207/#226).#249–#251capture; next engineering Wave 0 work is#201/#202.prlandedledger row for merged PR issues: queue fastest-wins plan and capture three follow-ups #1624.Test plan
npm run check:outstanding-issues—Outstanding-issues guard passed: 249 rows (118 open, 131 archived), unique ids, next-id=252npm run check:branch-review-ledger—Branch review ledger guard passed#250prose (+ ledger append); open↔queue coverage unchanged from main (118/118)static-prstays green on this docs-only ledger diffClinical Governance Preflight
Not applicable — docs-only ledger prose clarification; no clinical, ingestion, answer, retrieval, privacy, or production-env behaviour change.
RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — outstanding-issues / review-ledger metadata only.
Summary by CodeRabbit