docs(ledger): Run PR sweep records (2026-08-08) - #1749
Conversation
Append one superseding Run PR sweep row per PR touched in this pass (conflict syncs, CI fixes, and review-thread code fixes).
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in:28 minutes Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Comment |
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:e2952044da
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| | 2026-08-08 | cursor/phone-mode-dense-production-05c0 (PR #1648) | d2a0c8b12bcf3ea6b56c3d8291e4aa09da3e603e | Run PR sweep: CI fix + threads + drift | post-merge Unit coverage: restored usesPhoneSearchLayout min-h ternary for audit-navigation contract; CI re-running | vitest audit-navigation+mode-nav+header-scroll-hide 66 passed; no provider-backed checks | | ||
| | 2026-08-08 | cursor/site-testing-speed-08c1 (PR #1686) | 11e35727a6a9b3b776e890e6a63e43fea9b0a437 | Run PR sweep: CI fix + threads + drift | post-merge Unit coverage: added ui-phone-scroll-document-rail.spec.ts to playwright PR shard 1; CI re-running | vitest playwright-pr-shards 4 passed; playwright-pr-shards --validate OK; no provider-backed checks | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mark later sweep rows as superseding
When these post-merge CI fixes are recorded as later sweeps, both rows repeat the unchanged Run PR sweep: CI fix + threads + drift scope for PRs already recorded at lines 758 and 760. The repository requires one Run PR row per PR per sweep and a superseding record for a later sweep; leaving these unqualified creates stacked records with no authoritative correction chain, undermining review throttling and ledger auditing. Record each later outcome with a distinct superseding scope and verify by looking up both branch refs across this commit.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L147-L147
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
Run PR sweepledger rows for open PRs touched in this maintenance pass (main syncs, CI fixes, and review-thread code fixes).Test plan
npm run check:branch-review-ledgernpm run ledger:dedupeRAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — docs/ledger only.