Skip to content

docs(ledger): Run PR sweep records (2026-08-08) - #1749

Merged
BigSimmo merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/run-pr-sweep-ledger-f578
Aug 8, 2026
Merged

docs(ledger): Run PR sweep records (2026-08-08)#1749
BigSimmo merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/run-pr-sweep-ledger-f578

Conversation

@BigSimmo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Append superseding Run PR sweep ledger rows for open PRs touched in this maintenance pass (main syncs, CI fixes, and review-thread code fixes).
  • No product/runtime behaviour change; ledger-only documentation of the sweep.

Test plan

  • npm run check:branch-review-ledger
  • npm run ledger:dedupe

RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — docs/ledger only.

Open in WebOpen in Cursor

Append one superseding Run PR sweep row per PR touched in this pass
(conflict syncs, CI fixes, and review-thread code fixes).
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in:28 minutes

Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1f4b8c6b-f565-464b-8c74-d6b8d904473f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7dd5540 and 6efe25b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/branch-review-ledger.md

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@supabase

supabaseBot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@BigSimmo
BigSimmo marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2026 18:09
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo enabled auto-merge (squash) August 8, 2026 18:10

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit:e2952044da

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +773 to +774
| 2026-08-08 | cursor/phone-mode-dense-production-05c0 (PR #1648) | d2a0c8b12bcf3ea6b56c3d8291e4aa09da3e603e | Run PR sweep: CI fix + threads + drift | post-merge Unit coverage: restored usesPhoneSearchLayout min-h ternary for audit-navigation contract; CI re-running | vitest audit-navigation+mode-nav+header-scroll-hide 66 passed; no provider-backed checks |
| 2026-08-08 | cursor/site-testing-speed-08c1 (PR #1686) | 11e35727a6a9b3b776e890e6a63e43fea9b0a437 | Run PR sweep: CI fix + threads + drift | post-merge Unit coverage: added ui-phone-scroll-document-rail.spec.ts to playwright PR shard 1; CI re-running | vitest playwright-pr-shards 4 passed; playwright-pr-shards --validate OK; no provider-backed checks |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Mark later sweep rows as superseding

When these post-merge CI fixes are recorded as later sweeps, both rows repeat the unchanged Run PR sweep: CI fix + threads + drift scope for PRs already recorded at lines 758 and 760. The repository requires one Run PR row per PR per sweep and a superseding record for a later sweep; leaving these unqualified creates stacked records with no authoritative correction chain, undermining review throttling and ledger auditing. Record each later outcome with a distinct superseding scope and verify by looking up both branch refs across this commit.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L147-L147

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

cursoragentand others added 3 commits August 8, 2026 18:46
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo merged commit 52ededf into mainAug 8, 2026
25 checks passed
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo deleted the cursor/run-pr-sweep-ledger-f578 branch August 8, 2026 21:00
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BigSimmo@cursoragent