docs(issues): reconcile 17 queued ledger requests; record G1 merged and the S1d canary/#2065 revert state - #2089
Conversation
… record the S1d canary/#2065 revert state One fresh-base issues:reconcile over the complete pending inbox (17 requests, 2 cancellation decisions): closes #J912J9 (governance question) and #0MSNT8 (G1 task) via G1 PR #2053, closes #6BG9X2 (R2+R3) via S1c PR #2052; adds the three S5 adversarial-divergence pins, the RAG_TELEMETRY_EXTENDED owner decision, and the non-RAG captures queued since #2045. HANDOVER: G1 merged (125e985), S1d merged with its red canary bisected to #2065 (revert PR #2088), S1c follow-up note, S2 blocker re-keyed; COORDINATION §7 wave-1 status. Visual register refreshed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in:3 seconds Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You completed 99 included PR reviews in the past 7 days; at that activity level, included reviews refill at 1 review per hour. Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (21)
Comment |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
npm run issues:reconcileover the complete pending inbox: 17 requests applied, 2 cancellation decisions,0 pending / 234 appliedafterwards. Closes #J912J9 (document-summary governance question) and #0MSNT8 (G1 task) via G1 PR feat(rag): tag document-summary rows with a document_context provenance origin #2053, and #6BG9X2 (R2+R3) via S1c PR fix(rag): verify imperative dosing claims against descriptive guideline norms (packet S1c, R2+R3) #2052; adds the three S5 adversarial-divergence pins (#VXB8XA,#C2D9JF,#NTAV3D), theRAG_TELEMETRY_EXTENDEDowner decision (#2AB2NJ), and the non-RAG captures queued since docs(issues): reconcile 28 inbox requests into the outstanding-issues ledger #2045. Visual register refreshed (ISSUES_LIST_UPDATED).docs/rag-improvement/HANDOVER.md: G1 → Merged (125e98526); S1d → Merged (0bbd64fbc, landed by content) with its post canary run 32097916649 recorded as red onagitation-im-po-route-short-terms, bisected live to PR fix(rag): bind claim-leading for/in conditions in the high-risk trigger check (S1c follow-up) #2065 (S1c follow-up), not S1d; S1c row notes fix(rag): bind claim-leading for/in conditions in the high-risk trigger check (S1c follow-up) #2065 reverted by PR revert(rag): back out #2065 claim-leading condition binding after live canary regression #2088; S2 blocker re-keyed to the post-revert(rag): back out #2065 claim-leading condition binding after live canary regression #2088 confirmation canary.docs/rag-improvement/COORDINATION.md§7: wave-1 status as of 2026-08-18.RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — ledger reconcile and documentation only.
Verification
npm run check:outstanding-issues—Ledger inbox check passed: 0 pending request(s), 234 applied.·Outstanding-issues guard passed: 358 rows (104 open, 254 archived) … no ids deleted from base 981d85de0301.npm run check:ledger-write-discipline—Ledger write discipline passed for 981d85de0301..HEAD.npm run verify:pr-local -- --files <all changed>docs scope —completed: … check:branch-review-ledger, check:outstanding-issues, check:ledger-write-discipline — failed: (none).Risk and rollout
maingains new inbox requests before merge, close this and re-run one fresh reconcile.Opened by the RAG programme coordinator chat (Claude Code).