Add branch review records for PR #2338, #2337, #2333 sweep

[BigSimmo]

Summary

• Adds three immutable branch-review records (docs/branch-review-records/) documenting the Run-PR-style sweep checks on Therapy: drop the Review queue action from Pathways, colour the header, move Review to the mode bar #2338 (Therapy Pathways header), Add the Tools Show all chip to Calculators pages #2337 (Tools Show all chip + mockups), and feat(factsheets): Topics directory, Search-first ModeNav #2333 (Factsheets Topics browse).
• Add the Tools Show all chip to Calculators pages #2337: fixed a design-token ratchet failure (arbitrary tracking value replaced with the sanctioned token).
• feat(factsheets): Topics directory, Search-first ModeNav #2333: fixed a tap-target size regression (h-11/w-11 → h-12/w-12) and reconciled a concurrent upstream push during the merge.
• Therapy: drop the Review queue action from Pathways, colour the header, move Review to the mode bar #2338: only needed a sync from main.
• feat(factsheets): Topics directory, Search-first ModeNav #2333 and Therapy: drop the Review queue action from Pathways, colour the header, move Review to the mode bar #2338 still have an open PR policy check failure (missing ## Clinical Governance Preflight section in the PR body) — left open since PR-body edits are out of scope for this sweep; the PR author needs to fill that section in.

Test plan

• Docs-only change (three new content-addressed record files); no code paths affected by this PR itself.
• N/A — no build/test/lint required for this change.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01C4RHy24AtgPobEQQwrj7u1

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Note

Low Risk
Docs-only ledger appends under docs/branch-review-records/; no application, CI, or security code changes.

Overview
Adds ten content-addressed rows under docs/branch-review-records/ for 2026-08-24 Run PR sweeps. No product code.

Records cover main-syncs (#2296, #2297, #2338, #2339), CI fixes (#2325 pin allowlist, #2337 tracking token, #2333 tap targets, #2347 snapshot/docs-links), a flake diagnosis plus sync (#2341), and diagnosis-only for Dependabot Docker #2326 (Node 26 vs engines pin; no fix).

#2333 and #2338 still note an open PR-policy Clinical Governance Preflight gap left to authors. #2347 was closed by the owner mid-sweep after Static PR checks went green.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6f8fd91. Configure here.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)

• docs/branch-review-records/68d5616bffac66b7aa334e3785ed9de6aeca711c4280a58e263d58221ec6378c.record.md is excluded by !docs/**, !**/*.md
• docs/branch-review-records/72c5a9775b63dec1da3871de945351009d6a31809d32e80c7108d5b7d5a06c9d.record.md is excluded by !docs/**, !**/*.md
• docs/branch-review-records/ba504bd5ee15c145f50f09fae92928bfbfa0a5b546a8af0732fc674927c67c0c.record.md is excluded by !docs/**, !**/*.md

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 07c9b063-889e-4225-94e8-6fa901b5547f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[cursor]

Approved. Cursor Bugbot completed successfully with no findings requiring human review, and this docs-only ledger-record change has no applicable approval policy that requires extra review. No reviewers assigned.

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit:6f8fd91f79

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".