chore: 技术债清扫收尾——.pyc 出库 + escalate-test-issue.py 语法修复（ADR-0061/ADR-0070）

[randypanding]

Card: #392
ADR: ADR-0061（测试产物拓扑——.pyc 构建产物出库，防复发 .gitignore 已在位）+ ADR-0070（整洁关卡组——死代码/语法缺陷清理，行为保持）

变更（#392 卡收尾）

1. .pyc 编译产物出库：git rm --cached 3 个误提交文件
   • specs/IR-0004/suite/__pycache__/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
   • specs/IR-0004/suite/__pycache__/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311.pyc
   • specs/ISSUE-263/suite/__pycache__/test_ir263_artifacts.cpython-311.pyc
   • 源自 feat(butler): ADR-0074 落地——孤儿标签移除 + deadman 双层触发 + hc.io 实配（ADR-0074） #230/feat(governance): T-14 机器化第一面 + 红队 required check 落地修正（W2-C3 .github#275，ADR-0083） #336/spec(IR-0004): IR-0004 Cloudbird-Software/.github#315 条款级规格 rev4（ADR-0050，红队四轮 survived） #338；.gitignore 已含 __pycache__/ 与 *.pyc 防复发（先前 PR 已完成）
2. escalate-test-issue.py 语法修复：L97 f-string 内层 ASCII 双引号改「」（与 .github/scripts 旧副本风格一致）——修复前 py_compile 失败、脚本完全不可运行（chore: 近一周 PR 技术债清扫——构建产物出库 + 死代码移除（行为保持） #392 卡「另报」项）

卡内已完成项（先前 PR，不在本 PR 范围）

• metrics.py 死变量移除 ✓（pyflakes 零告警实证）
• dashboard-update.py TemporaryDirectory isdir 恒真防御 ✓（isdir 已不存在）
• sli-report.sh if False 死分支 ✓（grep 零命中实证）

验证

• python3 -m pyflakes scripts/escalate-test-issue.py 零告警；py_compile 通过
• make gates-pr 全绿（bash -n / yaml 解析 / 治理自测 19 项）

不碰：gate/verdict/drift 语义、pinned SHA、REPOS.yaml、workflows YAML、trae 备份产物。

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • 修复问题升级脚本生成说明文本时的引号语法错误。
  • 确保生成的内容语义保持不变，并可正常使用。

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

Remove tracked Python bytecode and restore escalation script syntax

🐞 Bug fix 🕐 Less than 10 minutes

AI Description

• Restores the test-error escalation script by fixing an invalid f-string quotation.
• Removes three generated bytecode files already covered by repository ignore rules.
• Preserves escalation behavior while completing ADR-0061 and ADR-0070 cleanup.

Diagram

graph TD
  A["Python Sources"] --> B["Python Runtime"] --> C["Bytecode Cache"] --> D["Ignore Rules"]
  E["Escalation Script"] --> F["Syntax Checks"]
  E --> G["Issue API"]

Loading

High-Level Assessment

The chosen approach is optimal: fix the malformed literal without changing behavior, and remove generated bytecode from the index while relying on existing ignore rules to prevent recurrence.

Files changed (1) +1 / -1

Bug fix (1) +1 / -1

escalate-test-issue.pyFix invalid quotation in escalation issue body +1/-1

Fix invalid quotation in escalation issue body

• Replaces nested ASCII double quotes with Chinese corner brackets inside the f-string. This restores Python parsing while preserving the generated issue text and escalation semantics.

scripts/escalate-test-issue.py

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• .trae-html-share-packages/scripts/create-cloudbird-agent-app.html.zip is excluded by !**/*.zip
• .trae-html-share-packages/scripts/create-verifier-app.html.zip is excluded by !**/*.zip

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f84729c7-9789-4667-b2ee-511c6afd597b

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fde86a8c-a530-4661-a293-fff3318c9ed8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cdf5492 and ea50735.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)

• specs/IR-0004/suite/__pycache__/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc is excluded by !**/*.pyc
• specs/IR-0004/suite/__pycache__/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311.pyc is excluded by !**/*.pyc
• specs/ISSUE-263/suite/__pycache__/test_ir263_artifacts.cpython-311.pyc is excluded by !**/*.pyc

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• scripts/escalate-test-issue.py

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 8 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

修正 create_issue 生成的 Issue 正文中的嵌套引号，避免 Python f-string 语法冲突。

Changes

Issue 正文生成修复

Layer / File(s)	Summary
修复 Issue 正文引号 scripts/escalate-test-issue.py	将“发现错误”文本的嵌套双引号替换为中文引号，保持原有语义并使脚本语法有效。

Suggested labels: bug, tech-debt

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ea507

This PR fixes an otherwise non-runnable test-escalation script and removes tracked Python bytecode artifacts without changing product behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	标题使用了有效的 Conventional Commits 前缀 chore，且与技术债清理和语法修复相关。但标题长度为 72 个字符，超过 50 个字符的要求。	将标题缩短至不超过 50 个字符，同时保留有效前缀和主要变更信息。例如：chore: 修复测试问题并清理技术债。

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/392-pyc-out-and-syntax-fix

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (1) 📜 Skill insights (0)

1. Missing ADR-0082 red-team sign-off 📘 Rule violation § Compliance

Description

This PR deletes files under specs/*/suite/**, which the checklist treats as spec/test-design
changes, but the PR metadata contains no explicit confirmation that the ADR-0082 red-team audit was
completed. The deletion therefore lacks the required audit evidence before merge.

Code

specs/IR-0004/suite/pycache/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc[1]

-�

Relevance

● Weak

Directly matches this PR's stated intent to remove committed .pyc build artifacts; not a real
compliance gap.

PR-#338
PR-#336

ⓘ Recommendations generated based on similar findings in past PRs

Evidence

The changed-file list includes three deleted files under specs/.../suite/, satisfying the rule's
applicability condition, while the supplied PR description mentions ADR-0061 and ADR-0070 but
contains no ADR-0082 red-team audit sign-off.

Rule 2855405: Require ADR-0082 red team audit sign-off for spec and test design changes
specs/IR-0004/suite/pycache/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc[1-1]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
The PR modifies files under `specs/*/suite/**` without explicit ADR-0082 red-team audit sign-off in the PR metadata.

## Issue Context
The compliance requirement applies to spec and test-design path changes, including deleted suite artifacts. Add a completed audit confirmation or an approval/comment from an identified red-team reviewer.

## Fix Focus Areas
- specs/IR-0004/suite/__pycache__/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc[1-1]
- specs/IR-0004/suite/__pycache__/test_spec_ir0004.cpython-311.pyc[1-1]
- specs/ISSUE-263/suite/__pycache__/test_ir263_artifacts.cpython-311.pyc[1-1]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

Context sources

✅ Compliance rules (platform): 22 rules

Review mode: 🚀 Fast: 变更仅涉及删除三个已生成的 .pyc 文件和修复脚本中一处字符串语法错误，逻辑影响局部且无高风险路径。

Tip of the day

💡 Did you know, you can enable the Remediation agent and Qodo fixes findings in a dedicated fix PR

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

[randypanding]

状态说明（2026-08-30，PM 清扫会话）：

本 PR 为 #392 技术债卡收尾（.pyc 出库 + escalate-test-issue.py 语法修复），本地 gates-pr 全绿、t14/g060/hygiene/org-gate 等 CI 全绿。

唯一待过关卡：adversary 红队审计（specs/** 路径变更触发，ADR-0082）。已按流程 4 次派发 CI-Workflows adversary 审计（target=specs/IR-0004，target_ref=本 PR head ea50735）：

• run 33303033958：LLM 应答不可解析（provider 瞬时故障，exit 3 infra）
• run 33303199016 / 33303458918 / 33303768165：LLM provider 持续 HTTP 429 限流（exit 4）

审计被 LLM 网关限流阻塞（infra，非套件缺陷）。provider 恢复后重派即可：

gh workflow run adversary --repo Cloudbird-Software/CI-Workflows \
  -f target=specs/IR-0004 -f target_repo=Cloudbird-Software/.github \
  -f target_ref=<head_sha> -f pr_repo=Cloudbird-Software/.github \
  -f pr_number=478 -f head_sha=<head_sha>

审计 success 后走 adversary-relay 写回 survived check，再重跑本 PR 的 gate job（当前 RED 即消）。