[Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48

Open
Open
[Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
Labels
enhancementNew feature or request

Description

@derrickmehaffy
derrickmehaffy
opened on Feb 19, 2026

Scope

  1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
  2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
  3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
  4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
  5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
  6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)

Implementation Details

HyperFactions side (we implement)

  • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
  • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
  • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
  • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
  • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
  • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)

SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)

  • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
  • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
  • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
  • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible

Risks and Alternatives

  1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
  2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
  3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
  4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.

References and Media

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

    Skip to content
    [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48
    Open
    Open
    [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
    Labels
    enhancementNew feature or request
    Description
    @derrickmehaffy
    derrickmehaffy
    opened on Feb 19, 2026
    Scope
    1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
    2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
    3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
    4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
    5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
    6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)
    Implementation Details
    HyperFactions side (we implement)
    • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
    • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
    • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
    • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
    • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
    • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)
    SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)
    • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
    • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
    • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
    • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible
    Risks and Alternatives
    1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
    2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
    3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
    4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.
    References and Media
    Metadata
    Metadata
    Assignees
    No one assigned
      Labels
      enhancementNew feature or request
      Type
      No type
      Projects
      Milestone
      No milestone
      Relationships
      None yet
      Development
      No branches or pull requests
      Issue actions
      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

      Skip to content
      [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48
      Open
      Open
      [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
      Labels
      enhancementNew feature or request
      Description
      @derrickmehaffy
      derrickmehaffy
      opened on Feb 19, 2026
      Scope
      1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
      2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
      3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
      4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
      5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
      6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)
      Implementation Details
      HyperFactions side (we implement)
      • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
      • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
      • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
      • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
      • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
      • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)
      SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)
      • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
      • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
      • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
      • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible
      Risks and Alternatives
      1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
      2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
      3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
      4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.
      References and Media
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        enhancementNew feature or request
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        Milestone
        No milestone
        Relationships
        None yet
        Development
        No branches or pull requests
        Issue actions
        
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

        Skip to content
        [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48
        Open
        Open
        [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
        Labels
        enhancementNew feature or request
        Description
        @derrickmehaffy
        derrickmehaffy
        opened on Feb 19, 2026
        Scope
        1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
        2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
        3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
        4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
        5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
        6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)
        Implementation Details
        HyperFactions side (we implement)
        • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
        • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
        • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
        • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
        • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
        • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)
        SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)
        • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
        • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
        • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
        • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible
        Risks and Alternatives
        1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
        2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
        3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
        4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.
        References and Media
        Metadata
        Metadata
        Assignees
        No one assigned
          Labels
          enhancementNew feature or request
          Type
          No type
          Projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

          Skip to content
          [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48
          Open
          Open
          [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
          Labels
          enhancementNew feature or request
          Description
          @derrickmehaffy
          derrickmehaffy
          opened on Feb 19, 2026
          Scope
          1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
          2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
          3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
          4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
          5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
          6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)
          Implementation Details
          HyperFactions side (we implement)
          • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
          • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
          • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
          • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
          • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
          • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)
          SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)
          • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
          • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
          • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
          • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible
          Risks and Alternatives
          1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
          2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
          3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
          4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.
          References and Media
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            enhancementNew feature or request
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            Milestone
            No milestone
            Relationships
            None yet
            Development
            No branches or pull requests
            Issue actions
            
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

            Skip to content
            [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48
            Open
            Open
            [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
            Labels
            enhancementNew feature or request
            Description
            @derrickmehaffy
            derrickmehaffy
            opened on Feb 19, 2026
            Scope
            1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
            2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
            3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
            4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
            5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
            6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)
            Implementation Details
            HyperFactions side (we implement)
            • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
            • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
            • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
            • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
            • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
            • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)
            SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)
            • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
            • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
            • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
            • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible
            Risks and Alternatives
            1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
            2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
            3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
            4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.
            References and Media
            Metadata
            Metadata
            Assignees
            No one assigned
              Labels
              enhancementNew feature or request
              Type
              No type
              Projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48
              Open
              Open
              [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
              Labels
              enhancementNew feature or request
              Description
              @derrickmehaffy
              derrickmehaffy
              opened on Feb 19, 2026
              Scope
              1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
              2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
              3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
              4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
              5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
              6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)
              Implementation Details
              HyperFactions side (we implement)
              • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
              • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
              • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
              • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
              • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
              • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)
              SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)
              • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
              • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
              • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
              • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible
              Risks and Alternatives
              1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
              2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
              3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
              4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.
              References and Media
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                enhancementNew feature or request
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                Milestone
                No milestone
                Relationships
                None yet
                Development
                No branches or pull requests
                Issue actions
                
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                Skip to content
                [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration #48
                Open
                Open
                [Feat] SimpleClaims cross-claim protection integration#48
                Labels
                enhancementNew feature or request
                Description
                @derrickmehaffy
                derrickmehaffy
                opened on Feb 19, 2026
                Scope
                1. Prevent HyperFactions from claiming chunks already claimed in SimpleClaims
                2. Prevent SimpleClaims from claiming chunks already claimed in HyperFactions (requires SimpleClaims-side integration)
                3. Integration should be a soft dependency (reflection-based, works with or without SimpleClaims installed)
                4. Should respect SimpleClaims reserved chunks (perimeter buffer) in addition to direct claims
                5. Should provide clear feedback to players when a claim is blocked due to the other mod
                6. Optionally configurable (enable/disable in config)
                Implementation Details
                HyperFactions side (we implement)
                • New SimpleClaimsIntegration class in com.hyperfactions.integration.protection (same pattern as OrbisGuardIntegration)
                • Reflection-based access to ClaimManager.getInstance() singleton
                • Check methods: getChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ) and getReservedChunk(dimension, chunkX, chunkZ)
                • Hook into ClaimManager.claimChunk() to check SimpleClaims before allowing HF claims
                • Config: "simpleclaims": { "enabled": true, "respectReservedChunks": true } in config.json
                • Permission: none needed (server-level config toggle)
                SimpleClaims side (PR or suggestion to Buuz135)
                • SimpleClaims should check HyperFactionsAPI.isClaimed(world, chunkX, chunkZ) before allowing claims
                • Our API is now on JitPack: compileOnly 'com.github.HyperSystemsDev:HyperFactions:v0.8.1'
                • SimpleClaims already uses reflection for other integrations (LuckPerms, PartyPro) — same pattern applies
                • Alternative: SimpleClaims could add a generic ClaimChecker interface that external mods register — more extensible
                Risks and Alternatives
                1. No stable API — SimpleClaims has no dedicated API package — all classes are internal and mutable. API surface could change between versions without notice.
                2. Reverse integration — The SimpleClaims → HyperFactions direction requires SimpleClaims to adopt our API or accept a PR. Buuz135 may prefer a different integration approach.
                3. Performance — Chunk claim checks happen frequently. Reflection overhead should be minimal since we cache method handles, but worth benchmarking.
                4. Alternative — Instead of direct mod-to-mod integration, both mods could integrate through OrbisGuard as a shared protection layer. However, this adds a mandatory third dependency.
                References and Media
                Metadata
                Metadata
                Assignees
                No one assigned
                  Labels
                  enhancementNew feature or request
                  Type
                  No type
                  Projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions