Release/401.0.0

[adonesky1]

@metamask/chain-agnostic-permission

[0.7.0]

Changed

• Bump @metamask/api-specs to ^0.14.0 (#5817)
• Bump @metamask/network-controller to ^23.5.0 (#5765, #5812)
• Bump @metamask/controller-utils to ^11.8.0 (#5765, #5812)

@metamask/multichain-api-middleware

[0.3.0]

Changed

• feat: Add more chain-agnostic-permission utility functions from sip-26 usage (#5609)
• Bump @metamask/chain-agnostic-permission to ^0.6.0 (#5715,#5760)
• Bump @metamask/api-specs to ^0.14.0 (#5817)
• Bump @metamask/controller-utils to ^11.9.0 (#5765, #5812)
• Bump @metamask/network-controller to ^23.5.0 (#5765, #5812)

@metamask/multichain

[4.1.0]

Changed

• Bump @metamask/api-specs to ^0.14.0 (#5817)
• Bump @metamask/controller-utils to ^11.9.0 (#5583, #5765, #5812)

Checklist

• I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
• I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate
• I've communicated my changes to consumers by updating changelogs for packages I've changed, highlighting breaking changes as necessary
• I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer packages to resolve any breaking changes

[cryptodev-2s]

Nit: What do you think about combining the three lines for the chain-agnostic permission bumps into a single entry, listing the PRs comma-separated? Also, I noticed a gap in the bump sequence—could it be that some PRs are missing?

Suggested change

	- Bump `@metamask/chain-agnostic-permission` to `^0.7.0` ([#5818](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5818))
	- Bump `@metamask/chain-agnostic-permission` to `^0.7.0` ([#5518](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5518), [#5674](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5674), [#5818](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5818))

[adonesky1]

cleaned up here: e967dd7

[adonesky1]

I believe the failing check-changelog process is incorrect...

Changelog check failed for package multichain-api-middleware: This PR contains changes that might require documentation in the changelog. If these changes aren't user-facing, consider adding the 'no-changelog' label instead.

I've made all the relevant changelog entries for multichain-api-middleware

[cryptodev-2s]

Nit: can we remove this entry from here now ?

[adonesky1]

🙏 fixed here: 2abe4bc

[cryptodev-2s]

LGTM!