Is this a duplicate?
Area
libcu++
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Current way of using hierarchy queries is:
cuda::hierarchy_dimensions<...> dims;
dims.extents(cuda::block, cuda::grid);
dims.index(cuda::block, cuda::grid);
which is a bit hard to read and can look weird for the .index(...) for example.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to do something that is more natural to a CUDA user:
cuda::hierarchy_dimensions<...> dims;
cuda::block.extents(cuda::grid, dims);
cuda::thread.index(cuda::grid, dims);
I think it's easier to read: block index in grid for given dims
The nice thing about this approach is that a user needn't to use hierarchy dimensions at all and do:
cuda::block.extents(cuda::grid);
cuda::thread.index(cuda::grid);
I will also provide .meow_as<int>(...) variants which can override the type that is returned by the query.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Is this a duplicate?
Area
libcu++
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Current way of using hierarchy queries is:
which is a bit hard to read and can look weird for the
.index(...)for example.Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to do something that is more natural to a CUDA user:
I think it's easier to read: block index in grid for given dims
The nice thing about this approach is that a user needn't to use hierarchy dimensions at all and do:
I will also provide
.meow_as<int>(...)variants which can override the type that is returned by the query.Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response