Skip to content

3.2 schema tests: 100% subschema (function) coverage - #4857

Closed
ralfhandl wants to merge 2 commits into
OAI:v3.2-devfrom
ralfhandl:3.2-schema-test-function-coverage
Closed

3.2 schema tests: 100% subschema (function) coverage#4857
ralfhandl wants to merge 2 commits into
OAI:v3.2-devfrom
ralfhandl:3.2-schema-test-function-coverage

Conversation

@ralfhandl

@ralfhandlralfhandl commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This covers all occurrences of unevaluatedProperties: true and brings subschema (function) coverage up to 100%.

This would allow setting the coverage threshold to 100 and then automatically spotting if someone added a new fixed field to an Object without adding a "pass" test case for that fixed field.

See also discussion

  • no schema changes are needed for this pull request

@ralfhandlralfhandl added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Aug 13, 2025
@ralfhandlralfhandl added the Schema changes related to the schema(s) label Aug 13, 2025
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl changed the base branch from main to v3.2-devAugust 13, 2025 12:41
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2025 16:29
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl requested review from a team as code ownersAugust 13, 2025 16:29
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl marked this pull request as draft August 15, 2025 08:31
@ralfhandlralfhandl modified the milestones: v3.2.0, 3.2.1Sep 20, 2025
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2025 16:44
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl requested a review from a teamSeptember 21, 2025 16:44
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl marked this pull request as draft October 31, 2025 08:50
@ralfhandl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Replaced with better approach in

@ralfhandl
ralfhandl deleted the 3.2-schema-test-function-coverage branch October 31, 2025 15:59
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Schemachanges related to the schema(s)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ralfhandl@miqui