[12.0][MIG] users_ldap_groups - #46
Conversation
|
@hbrunn if you don't mind, please take a look |
|
Frankly speaking, not much code left :| |
2e774b9 to
7e6f7d9
Compare
|
@pedrobaeza if you don't mind, I'll bump this to your attention |
|
Well, I can't be very helpful here as I don't use this module and don't know about this area. What I can say is about the guidelines, as this module contains plurals, being dragged since long, but I won't force to change it if contributors don't want. |
|
Frankly speaking, I'm thinking of making a bit revised (an more UX-friendly) one as an alternative |
|
Looking at the description, |
|
It may, and actually they do share some code. I think that's up to reviewers if to keep modules lean-and-mean or to make complex ones. Why |
|
@hbrunn you were the original author of this. What do you think? |
|
I think it's great that @alexey-pelykh does all the efforts, thanks for that. Group stuff is very different from attributes like whatever is not a group, so I think this surely merits its own module. |
|
Can we rename this at least to |
3fedb58 to
ee32d69
Compare
|
Indeed was issue with the code and with tests |
ee32d69 to
8e01e59
Compare
|
Decided to keep the original behaviour, thus changed the PR |
cdd1412 to
1ae48ae
Compare
nikul-serpentcs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor change Otherwise LGTM
|
This PR has the |
|
Hey @alexey-pelykh, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
Appreciation of efforts, |
|
@alexey-pelykh thanks a lot for this. I would advise you to ping people as little as possible, we're all doing our best in reviews. In the best case, your ping doesn't create more time for people and is basically a no-op, in the worst case it creates noise. |

No description provided.