Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Better support for inline schemas in parameters - #12369

Merged
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance
May 20, 2022
Merged

Better support for inline schemas in parameters#12369
wing328 merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
inline-parameter-enhance

Conversation

@wing328

@wing328wing328 commented May 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • better support for inline schemas in parameters
  • add isModelWithPropertiesOnly method

FYI. @OpenAPITools/generator-core-team

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@wing328
wing328 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 16:45
@wing328wing328 added Enhancement: General Inline Schema Handling Schema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf labels May 14, 2022
@wing328wing328 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 14, 2022
* @param schema potentially containing a '$ref'
* @return true if it's a model with at least one properties
*/
public static boolean isModelWithPropertiesOnly(Schema schema) {

@spacetherspacetherMay 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Do you want this to be true for AnyType models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.
  • Do you want this to be true for array/string/number models with properties and additionalProperties set? Right now it is true for that case.

How about limiting this to type object and AnyType models only?
Also type object with additionalProperties unset is the same as type object with additionalProperties true so why is this code returning different results for those same use cases?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review.

I previously didn't check getAdditionalProperties() but got a few issues (change in samples). Adding the check seems to fix it but you're right that it needs to revised further.

I simply want to set the isModel flag correctly because now isMap is set to true for a simple model. I've not touched the code in modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/IJsonSchemaValidationProperties.java for a while so I welcome suggestions on other way to fix the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me look into what is happening with python experimental. I think it is changing because the component schema changed

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be true if the schema also has anyOf or allOf definitions?

if (parameter.getSchema() != null) {
parameterSchema = parameter.getSchema();
parameterModelName = getParameterDataType(parameter ,parameter.getSchema());
parameterSchema = ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema(openAPI, parameter.getSchema());

@spacetherspacetherMay 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something odd is happening with unaliasSchema
The original code extracts the schema, unaliases it, then uses that unaliased schemas to set properties.

This code instead gets the schema from the ref automatically.
So why is unaliasSchema not handling this case automatically originally?

if (parameterDataType != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterDataType;
if (parameterModelName != null) {
codegenParameter.dataType = parameterModelName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why should codegenParameters handle dataType and complexType differently than codegenProperty?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change above simply uses a different (better) name in the code block as parameterDataType originally aims to store the model name so no change in code logic if I remember correctly.

spacetherand others added 4 commits May 19, 2022 10:50
* Uses unaliasSchema rather than ModelUtils.getReferencedSchema
* Fixes python-experimental, delays param schema setting
* Samples regenerated
* Adds parameterModelName setting back in
* Samples regenerated
* removes needToSetSchema
* Sets schema differently depending on if inline model resolver is used
* Adds step for getting ref schema
* Samples regen
@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi guys. Will this PR fixes #11151 ?

@wing328

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Dimon70007 please pull the latest master to give it a try.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks. I'll try it this evening.

@Dimon70007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Have tried to build from source with

mvn clean package

but there were failed tests

[ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] DefaultGeneratorTest.supportCustomTemplateEngine:313 » Runtime Could not generate api file for 'Ping'
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithSectionalTest:47->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@486b7642:1:4: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@486b7642:1:4
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithTest:61->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@43bd77be:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@43bd77be:1:2
[ERROR] StringHelpersTest.startsWithYesOverrideTest:81->evaluate:28 » Handlebars inline@689e2599:1:2: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field transient java.util.HashMap$Node[] java.util.HashMap.table accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.util" to unnamed module @3b22cdd0
inline@689e2599:1:2
[INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 1634, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Did i do something wrong?

@Dimon70007

Dimon70007 commented May 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

succeed package jar with ./mvnw clean package
but have no luck when parsing schema with many $ref

.map(entry -> {
CodegenProperty property = fromProperty(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
property.baseName = codegenParameter.baseName + "[" + entry.getKey() + "]";
return property;

@spacetherspacetherOct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is property.baseName being modified here?
Can this be made to work without modifying the baseName?
Why not modify name instead or another string property.
baseName is historically used to store the spec case property name.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking change (without fallback)Enhancement: GeneralInline Schema HandlingSchema contains a complex schema in items/additionalProperties/allOf/oneOf/anyOf

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wing328@Dimon70007@spacether