Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Equil Developement - #13
Conversation
Initial work done by Jaymyoung Lee
logan-nc
commented
Jul 28, 2025
@jmlmir369 the Details |
added Pkg.resolve() in front of Pkg.instantiate()
to fix the environment julia using
matt-pharr
commented
Aug 5, 2025
jmlmir369
commented
Aug 5, 2025
Most of the development has been completed except for inverse.f. It's also already been merged with the ode_team branch. So unless there's a need to rewrite the vacuum code in Julia (since Brendan Lyons is currently modernizing the spline package, which is based on the spline used in this code, it would be better to merge the spline from this branch before proceeding with the vacuum code), there's probably no need to do anything at this point. It might be better to merge everything after inverse.jl and the ODE team’s work are completed. |
matt-pharr
commented
Aug 5, 2025
via email
Is someone working on this branch on inverse.f? If that development has not yet started or is easy to port over, I suggest merging this pull request into main now and then making a new pull request for inverse.f once ode team has merged into main. We are most of the way through rewriting the essential parts of vacuum, but vacuum does not use anything from equil, and the splines used in vacuum should be easy to drop-in-replace with Brendan’s refactored splines later. |
jaesun57
commented
Aug 5, 2025
I’ve pushed all the work I’ve done so far on converting inverse.f. The Jupyter notebook (.ipynb) is not ready yet — @ebursch might be able to work on that. |
matt-pharr
commented
Aug 5, 2025
@satelite2517 Is there more work to be done on EQUIL beyond the jupyter notebook example? It should be pretty quick to make an example right? |
I think there aren't many works left. Adding some methods to grid_type and |
logan-nc
commented
Aug 28, 2025
@satelite2517 I believe this is the only remaining thing this branch is waiting on. I think we should wrap it up for now, since we have the basic functionality needed to run. Future branches can add features with more equilibrium interfaces. I'd like to merge this branch to |
matt-pharr
commented
Oct 9, 2025
@satelite2517 @logan-nc What is the status of this branch? |
logan-nc
commented
Oct 9, 2025
As per the comment above, I think it was just waiting on @satelite2517 to wrap up a few things in progress. |
This is a placeholder for the equil development. More documentation will be added later