Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6252 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6252 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6252 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6252 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6252 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6252 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6252 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) - #6252

Merged
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22)#6252
max-sixty merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend-* workflow files via uvx tend@latest init. Beyond the action-ref bumps, this release reworks the tend-notifications pre-check and removes the tend-review HEAD gate — both are inlined shell in the generated workflows, so they show up as real diff rather than a version stamp.

tend version: 0.1.20 → 0.1.22

Notable changes

Full upstream diff: max-sixty/tend@0.1.20...0.1.22


Also in this PR: an .github/actionlint.yaml entry for the concurrency.queue key.

0.1.22's tend-review.yaml uses queue: max, a real GitHub concurrency key that actionlint does not recognise — it fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, turning both MegaLinter and the pre-commit actionlint hook red. Upstream tracks this in rhysd/actionlint#654 and #657; the PR adding support (#661) was closed unmerged, and v1.7.12 — the latest release, and the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml — still rejects it. Without the suppression every future nightly regen lands red, so it ships here rather than as a separate PR that this one would have to wait on.

The ignore is scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml and to that one message. Verified locally with actionlint v1.7.12: the whole workflow directory lints clean with the entry, and adding an unrelated bogus key to the same concurrency: block still errors, so the suppression isn't swallowing real problems.

@prql-botprql-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit.ci is red on this head, and it won't clear on its own.

actionlint rejects queue: max. The new concurrency.queue key in tend-review.yaml is valid GitHub syntax (docs), but actionlint's schema doesn't know it yet, so the pinned v1.7.12 hook fails the run:

.github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]

Waiting for an autoupdate won't help: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is the latest release, rhysd/actionlint#657 and #654 are both open, and the PR that added support (#661) was closed unmerged.

Fix — tend's own repo already hit this and carries the remedy in its .pre-commit-config.yaml; mirroring it here is enough:

 - repo: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlintrev: v1.7.12hooks:
- id: actionlint# GitHub accepts concurrency.queue, but this pin does not yet know it.# Ignore only that schema false positive.args:
- -ignore
- 'unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section'

I verified this against actionlint v1.7.12 on the merged tree: the whole .github/workflows/ set exits 0 with the flag and reports only the queue diagnostic without it, so nothing else is being suppressed. .pre-commit-config.yaml is outside this diff, so it needs a commit rather than a suggestion.

Separately, this looks like an upstream gap rather than a PRQL one — the generator emits queue: max into every adopter's workflows, but the -ignore arg only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so any adopter running the actionlint hook goes red on the next regen. Worth an issue on max-sixty/tend.

Overlaps with #6251. That PR regenerates the same eight tend-*.yaml files to add sandbox_setup: blocks, and those blocks sit in the with: mapping directly under the uses: max-sixty/tend/claude@… line this PR bumps — so the two will conflict. Whichever lands second should be regenerated with uvx tend init rather than hand-merged, particularly since 0.1.22 changes how block prompts are padded (max-sixty/tend#1090), which is exactly the rendering #6251 depends on.

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Fixed in 8a41d64, and the remedy is broader than the one my review proposed. Two checks were red on this head, not one — pre-commit.ci - pr and lint-megalinter / MegaLinter — on the same diagnostic. MegaLinter runs actionlint through its own ACTION_ACTIONLINT descriptor, so the -ignore hook arg I suggested for .pre-commit-config.yaml would have cleared pre-commit.ci and left MegaLinter red. The paths/ignore block in .github/actionlint.yaml that landed instead is read by the binary itself, so it covers both runners and any direct CLI call, and it's scoped to .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml so a schema typo in a hand-written workflow still fails.

The upstream gap is filed as max-sixty/tend#1094 — the generator emits queue: max for every adopter, but the suppression only exists in tend's own pre-commit config, so each adopter hits this on their next regen.

Verification and sources

Against the actionlint v1.7.12 release binary (linux_amd64) on this branch:

  • no config change → .github/workflows/tend-review.yaml:22:7: unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section. expected one of "cancel-in-progress", "group" [syntax-check]
  • with the block in 8a41d64 → exits 0 over .github/workflows/*.yaml
  • negative control: an injected bogus-top-level-key: true in tend-review.yaml still fails with the block in place, so the ignore isn't swallowing other diagnostics

MegaLinter's failure was the same single blocking diagnostic — run 33297574559 reports Linted [ACTION] files with [actionlint]: Found 1 error(s); everything else it flagged (jscpd, shellcheck, cpplint) is already under DISABLE_ERRORS_LINTERS in .mega-linter.yaml. check-ok-to-merge was red as a consequence of those two.

Upstream state, rechecked: v1.7.12 (2026-03-30) is still the latest release; rhysd/actionlint#657 (issue) and #654 (PR) are open; #661 was closed unmerged. My review called #654 an issue — it's a PR.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit 056d158 into mainAug 30, 2026
43 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 30, 2026 14:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty