Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6255 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6255 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6255 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6255 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6255 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6255 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) by prql-bot · Pull Request #6255 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24) - #6255

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update tend workflows (0.1.22 → 0.1.24)#6255
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tend/update-workflows

Conversation

@prql-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nightly regeneration of the tend workflow files (uvx tend@latest init).

tend version: 0.1.22 → 0.1.24

Notable changes

  • max-sixty/tend#1108tend-notifications now also boots when a bot-authored PR looks conflicted, so a conflicted bot PR gets rebased on the frequent poll instead of waiting for the nightly sweep. This is most of the diff in tend-notifications.yaml: a GraphQL scan for non-MERGEABLE bot PRs feeds a new conflict_count output that gates the checkout and agent steps.
  • max-sixty/tend#1103 — the generator emits multi-line prompts as a block scalar, replacing the format(...) one-liner in tend-review.yaml.
  • max-sixty/tend#1095 — the generator writes the concurrency.queue actionlint ignore itself, so the entry chore: update tend workflows (0.1.20 → 0.1.22) #6252 added by hand is dropped here (see below).
  • max-sixty/tend#1087, #1080, #1104, #1107 — review-skill behavior: APPROVE is gated on the author stating the PR is ready rather than just the draft flag, the code-review pass becomes its own step gated at submit, and the posting checks move into a preflight script bound to the outward action.
  • max-sixty/tend#1109, #1110uv is provisioned for agent sessions, and an experimental Gist-backed memory is available.

Full compare: max-sixty/tend@0.1.22...0.1.24

The actionlint entry

tend init appended its own **/.github/workflows/tend-*.yaml ignore alongside the .github/workflows/tend-*.yaml one #6252 added by hand yesterday — two entries for the same rule. This PR keeps the generated one and drops ours, retaining the comment that explains why the ignore exists at all.

Verification

Checked with actionlint v1.7.12 (the version pinned in .pre-commit-config.yaml) inside the regeneration worktree:

  • With no ignore at all, tend-review.yaml:22 fails with unexpected key "queue" for "concurrency" section, so the rule is still live upstream.
  • With only the generated **/-prefixed entry, that error is suppressed — the glob does match the root-level path, so dropping the hand-written entry loses nothing.
  • actionlint over the whole repo exits 0 with the deduped config.
  • prettier@3.9.6 --check is clean; it normalizes the generated entry's single quotes to double quotes, and a second tend init recognizes the normalized key and leaves it alone, so this doesn't churn on the next nightly.

No test accompanies this change — the workflow files are generated, and their behavior is exercised by the tend runs themselves.

@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit a42c3a2 into mainAug 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the tend/update-workflows branch August 31, 2026 18:34
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty