perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1) - #312

Merged
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

perf(images): lazy-load below-the-fold remote images (#111, part 1)#312
AndresL230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/111-image-lazy

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #111 (image-loading slice). Adds loading="lazy" to the 6 remote/user-content <img> elements that render below the fold: Social chat attachments, MarkdownChat markdown images, Settings cosmetic overlay + banner, Admin cosmetic preview + catalog thumbnails. The fixed 28×28 catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve space.

Responsive images get lazy only — forced fixed dims would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.

Verified locally:npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (pre-existing no-img-element warnings unchanged).

Deliberately not here (the rest of #111):

  • Runtime-animation perf — landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur/querySelectorAll, atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render. Real work, separate PR.
  • Full next/image — non-trivial on OpenNext/Cloudflare (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).

So #111 stays open; this is the low-risk lazy-loading slice.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add loading="lazy" to the remote/user-content <img> elements that render below
the fold so they don't compete with initial load:
- Social chat attachments; MarkdownChat markdown images
- Settings cosmetic overlay + banner previews
- Admin cosmetic upload preview + catalog-row thumbnails (the fixed 28x28
catalog thumb also gets width/height attrs to reserve its space)
Responsive images (maxWidth / container-filled) get lazy only — forced fixed
dimensions would distort them; their space is already reserved by the parent.
Scope: this is the image-loading slice of #111. The runtime-animation half
(landing-canvas reduced-motion guard, per-frame shadowBlur / querySelectorAll,
atmospheric-orb throttle, KnowledgeGraph2D per-tick re-render) is separate and
not in this PR. Full next/image adoption is deferred — non-trivial on the
OpenNext/Cloudflare target (no built-in optimizer; needs a custom loader).
Verified: npm run typecheck clean; eslint 0 errors on the changed files (the
pre-existing no-img-element warnings are unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

cloudflare-workers-and-pagesBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend-staging993eb2cCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 03 2026, 02:57 AM

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:45 seconds

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f63b249-bda4-4886-9aa9-9f8c5abd2a9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c515314 and 993eb2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/MarkdownChat.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Admin.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Settings.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/screens/Social.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/111-image-lazy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndresL230AndresL230 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed — approving. All 6 lazy sites verified: the Settings/Admin previews sit in explicitly sized containers, the catalog thumb's new width/height attrs match its styles, coverage sweep found no missed remote images, and the next/image deferral is accurate (no loader configured for OpenNext/Cloudflare).

One known trade-off, accepted rather than blocking: room-chat attachments have no reserved height, so scrolling up through history now pops images in as they load — invisible-ish on Chrome/Firefox (scroll anchoring), visible jumps on Safari/iOS (no anchoring). Can't be fixed here since room_messages stores no image dimensions; filed #315 to capture width/height at upload and reserve an aspect-ratio box.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@AndresL230
AndresL230 merged commit ced8827 into mainJul 3, 2026
6 checks passed
AndresL230 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
* feat(social): reserve space for chat image attachments (#315)
Room-chat attachments rendered into a zero-height box until the image loaded.
Combined with the `loading="lazy"` that #312 added, scrolling UP through
history expanded each image as it neared the viewport and shifted the
transcript mid-scroll. Chrome and Firefox mostly absorb that with scroll
anchoring; Safari has none, so the viewport visibly jumps on every load. It
also invalidated the loadEarlier scrollTop compensation, which measures
scrollHeight before the prepended images have loaded.
This could not be fixed in the frontend alone: room_messages stored only
image_url, so there was nothing to reserve a box with.
0040 image_width / image_height on room_messages, nullable
models the same two fields on SendMessageBody, optional
social.py both columns in the select list and the insert
api.ts sendRoomMessage takes an optional imageSize
Social.tsx measures the file before upload; renders into an aspect-ratio box
The measurement happens on the picked File via an object URL, before upload,
so the dimensions travel with the message that creates it — history then
renders reserved from the first paint rather than after a round trip.
Degrades quietly by design, at every layer. The columns are nullable and
unbackfilled, so every message written before this keeps NULL; readImageSize
resolves undefined on a non-image or a decode failure rather than blocking
the send; and the renderer only applies width/height/aspect-ratio when both
values are present. Anything without dimensions renders exactly as it does
today. Backfilling would mean fetching every historical image to measure it,
which is not worth it for a layout hint.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(social): bound the client-supplied image dimensions (#315)
Review finding, and a real one: image_width/image_height arrive from the
client and the transcript renders them directly as an aspect-ratio, so an
absurd pair is a layout weapon against every member of the room rather than a
bad row for its author.
Unbounded, any room member could POST width=1, height=2000000000 — comfortably
inside Postgres INTEGER range, so it inserts cleanly — and every viewer of
that room gets a ~2-billion-pixel-tall bubble, with no edit path to recover
short of a DB fix. That is a genuine escalation in blast radius: before this
PR the worst a bogus attachment could do was render a broken-image icon.
Bounded at three layers:
models Field(gt=0, le=20000) on both, matching the Field(gt=0) pattern
this file already uses for client-supplied numerics. 20000 is
comfortably past any real image (8K is 7680).
migration a CHECK constraint, matching the convention 0021 established.
NOT VALID so it governs new writes without scanning existing
rows — every pre-existing row is NULL in both columns, and NULL
passes a CHECK anyway. Wrapped so a re-run is a no-op.
render objectFit: contain and maxHeight, so dimensions that are merely
WRONG (rather than absurd) letterbox instead of stretching, and
a tall ratio cannot escape the box — maxWidth alone cannot cap
height once the ratio drives it.
Editing 0040 rather than adding 0041 because it has not been applied
anywhere: it is unmerged, and the only database that has seen it is the local
throwaway the from-empty replay rebuilds from scratch each run.
Adds tests for the bounds — nothing covered these fields before.
part of #315
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AndresL230
AndresL230 deleted the fix/111-image-lazy branch August 2, 2026 18:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez@AndresL230