Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points by Chemaclass · Pull Request #858 · TypedDevs/bashunit · GitHub
Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points by Chemaclass · Pull Request #858 · TypedDevs/bashunit · GitHub
Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points by Chemaclass · Pull Request #858 · TypedDevs/bashunit · GitHub
Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points by Chemaclass · Pull Request #858 · TypedDevs/bashunit · GitHub
Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points by Chemaclass · Pull Request #858 · TypedDevs/bashunit · GitHub
Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points by Chemaclass · Pull Request #858 · TypedDevs/bashunit · GitHub
Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points by Chemaclass · Pull Request #858 · TypedDevs/bashunit · GitHub
Skip to content

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points - #858

Merged
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat(coverage): report loop constructs as branch points#858
Chemaclass merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/855-branch-coverage-loops

Conversation

@Chemaclass

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤔 Background

Related #855

Branch coverage only understood if/elif/else and case (ADR-007 MVP). Loops were invisible, so a never-entered while/for body counted as fully covered.

💡 Changes

  • Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select: a loop is a single-arm branch (its body), taken iff the loop ran at least once — a zero-iteration loop now surfaces as an uncovered branch.
  • Nested loops pair done with the correct opener; the existing line-hit inference and report path consume the new loop records unchanged (no runtime cost).
  • Same-line short-circuit guards stay out of scope (line-granularity limit); documented in ADR-007.
  • Covered by extraction tests (while/for/until/nested) and end-to-end compute_branch_hits tests (body taken + zero-iteration not-taken).

Extend static branch extraction to while/until/for/select loops. A loop is a
single-arm branch — its body range — taken iff an executable body line was hit
(the loop ran at least once), so a never-entered zero-iteration loop now
surfaces as an uncovered branch. Every done-closed opener pushes a frame so done
pairs with the right opener when nested; the existing line-hit inference and
report path consume the new 'loop' records unchanged.
Same-line short-circuit guards ([ cond ] && action) remain out of scope: the
DEBUG trap records line hits, not sub-line outcomes, so both outcomes share one
line. Documented in adr-007.
Closes#855
@ChemaclassChemaclass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 24, 2026
@ChemaclassChemaclass self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass merged commit 61d605f into mainJul 24, 2026
37 checks passed
@Chemaclass
Chemaclass deleted the feat/855-branch-coverage-loops branch July 24, 2026 07:10
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Chemaclass