Skip to content

fix(cdk-platform): pass {} to @NgModule since passing nothing breaks in JIT mode - #13792

Merged
mmalerba merged 1 commit into
angular:masterfrom
mmalerba:fix
Oct 24, 2018
Merged

fix(cdk-platform): pass {} to @NgModule since passing nothing breaks in JIT mode#13792
mmalerba merged 1 commit into
angular:masterfrom
mmalerba:fix

Conversation

@mmalerba

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@mmalerbammalerba added P1 Impacts a large percentage of users; if a workaround exists it is partial or overly painful target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Oct 24, 2018
@googlebotgooglebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Oct 24, 2018

@devversiondevversion left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@devversiondevversion added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Oct 24, 2018

@crisbetocrisbeto left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add a comment that it’s necessary?

@mmalerba
mmalerba merged commit 65dd75d into angular:masterOct 24, 2018
mmalerba added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
crisbeto added a commit to crisbeto/material2 that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2018
* Expands the decorator validation rule to allow us to run a regex against all the arguments of a decorator. This allows us to guard against cases like angular#13792.
* Fixes a similar issue as angular#13792 in the `LayoutModule` which was caught after the new changes to the rule.
jelbourn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
#13843)
* Expands the decorator validation rule to allow us to run a regex against all the arguments of a decorator. This allows us to guard against cases like #13792.
* Fixes a similar issue as #13792 in the `LayoutModule` which was caught after the new changes to the rule.
atscott pushed a commit to atscott/components that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2018
atscott pushed a commit to atscott/components that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2018
angular#13843)
* Expands the decorator validation rule to allow us to run a regex against all the arguments of a decorator. This allows us to guard against cases like angular#13792.
* Fixes a similar issue as angular#13792 in the `LayoutModule` which was caught after the new changes to the rule.
jelbourn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2018
#13843)
* Expands the decorator validation rule to allow us to run a regex against all the arguments of a decorator. This allows us to guard against cases like #13792.
* Fixes a similar issue as #13792 in the `LayoutModule` which was caught after the new changes to the rule.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-botangular-automatic-lock-botBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: mergeThe PR is ready for merge by the caretakercla: yesPR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License AgreementP1Impacts a large percentage of users; if a workaround exists it is partial or overly painfultarget: patchThis PR is targeted for the next patch release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@mmalerba@crisbeto@devversion@jelbourn@googlebot