Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Decouple production executor warning in dags UI - #29609
Conversation
dimberman
commented
Feb 19, 2023
@o-nikolas looks like there are a few failing tests. Once these are fixed would be glad to merge. |
fab2657 to
947e546Comparepotiuk
commented
Feb 25, 2023
I think it needs rebase. |
o-nikolas
commented
Mar 1, 2023
Interesting development: |
o-nikolas
commented
Mar 3, 2023
Thoughts on the above anyone? |
uranusjr
commented
Mar 3, 2023
Scraping it sounds reasonable to me |
potiuk
commented
Mar 3, 2023
Yep. Scrap it @o-nikolas |
o-nikolas
commented
Mar 3, 2023
Thanks for the feedback! I'll scrap it for now 👍 |
o-nikolas
commented
Mar 3, 2023
Sorry for the confusion, but this code is still needed after all. I thought things had changed in a way that they haven't. I'll update this PR today |
Previously the views code was hardcoded to look out for the SequentialExecutor and warn to not use it in production. This change makes that generalized to any non-production executor
947e546 to
79d36d0Compareo-nikolas
commented
Mar 3, 2023
Sorry again for the confusion, but this PR is ready again for review 🙏 |
potiuk
commented
Mar 4, 2023
LGTM |
Previously the views code was hardcoded to look out for the SequentialExecutor and warn to not use it in production. This change makes that generalized to any non-production executor.
Some screenshots below:
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.