Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove deprecated airflow.kubernetes package - #41735
Merged
potiuk merged 3 commits intoAug 27, 2024
Merged
Conversation
jscheffl
requested review from
ashb, bolkedebruin, dstandish, hussein-awala, jedcunningham and kaxil
as code ownersAugust 25, 2024 21:53
eladkal
reviewed
Aug 26, 2024
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
eladkal
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2024
vincbeck
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2024
potiuk
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2024
2 tasks
jscheffl
deleted the
feature/remove-deprecated-airflow.kubernetes-package
branch
October 5, 2025 07:40
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cleanup as deprecation promised for Airflow 3
Note that the PR will fail as CNCF-Kuberntes Provider still holds a reference to import of
airflow.kuberneteslegacy. THis is removed in PR #41746 and this probably needs to be merged first allowing and then having a rebase here.