You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Yes (please specify the tool below)
The hook was meant to stop airflow-core from gaining new runtime dependencies on the task SDK, but it worked by excluding whole files that already had an import when the check was added. That made it blind to new imports added later to any of those files - which is exactly what happened in #70370, where a new airflow.sdk import landed
in models/taskinstance.py unnoticed because the file was already on the exclude list for an older, unrelated import.
Track an allowed import count per file instead (same pattern as check_new_airflow_exception_usage.py), so existing file can't quietly gain more without either a # noqa: SDK001 or a deliberate allowlist regeneration.
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.
Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.
#71212) (#71398)
* Consolidate AllowlistManager for prek hooks (#69327)
* Extract common AllowListManager base class for prek hooks
The allowlist load/save/generate/cleanup logic was duplicated across
check_new_airflow_exception_usage.py and check_provide_session_kwargs.py.
This consolidates the shared pattern into an abstract AllowListManager
in common_prek_utils.py, with subclasses providing only iter_files()
and count_occurrences().
* Move check loop and parse into AllowlistManager base class
The initial extraction left the scan/tighten/report loop duplicated
in both hook scripts and exposed `parse` as a staticmethod that
silently ignored the instance's `repo_root`.
- Convert `parse` from `@staticmethod` to instance method so it
always uses `self.repo_root` (fixes the latent footgun where
`_parse_tracked_allowlist` called parse unbound).
- Hoist the check loop into `AllowlistManager.check()` with
`violation_panel_text()` (abstract) and `format_violation_details()`
(overridable) hooks — both `_check_*` wrappers are now one-liners.
- Fix naming: `AllowListManager` → `AllowlistManager` to match the
subclass convention used throughout.
- Add test coverage for `check_new_airflow_exception_usage.py`.
(cherry picked from commit 7e47a52)
* [v3-3-test] Convert check-sdk-imports to capture occurences than files (#71212)
(cherry picked from commit d8cfc95)
Co-authored-by: Amogh Desai <amoghrajesh1999@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason(Zhe-You) Liu <68415893+jason810496@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amogh Desai <amoghrajesh1999@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
The hook was meant to stop airflow-core from gaining new runtime dependencies on the task SDK, but it worked by excluding whole files that already had an import when the check was added. That made it blind to new imports added later to any of those files - which is exactly what happened in #70370, where a new
airflow.sdkimport landedin
models/taskinstance.pyunnoticed because the file was already on the exclude list for an older, unrelated import.Track an allowed import count per file instead (same pattern as
check_new_airflow_exception_usage.py), so existing file can't quietly gain more without either a# noqa: SDK001or a deliberate allowlist regeneration.{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.