GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23 - #47328

Closed
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main
Closed

GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23#47328
BwL1289 wants to merge 28 commits into
apache:mainfrom
eugo-inc:main

Conversation

@BwL1289

@BwL1289BwL1289 commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rationale for this change

Arrow’s C++ codebase currently targets an older C++ standard. Moving to C++23 helps keep the project aligned with modern compiler defaults, enables new language features, and ensures continued compatibility with upcoming compiler versions.

During this upgrade, several forward declaration patterns used in the codebase became invalid under C++23 rules, requiring changes to maintain build correctness.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR updates code to resolve forward declaration errors triggered by C++23 compliance checks. Specifically, it corrects invalid or outdated forward declarations that are rejected by C++23.

Applies the fixes in:

  • cpp/src/arrow/acero/asof_join_node.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/mockfs.cc
  • cpp/src/arrow/flight/types.h

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

gorloffslavaand others added 28 commits November 1, 2024 20:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #47207has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@BwL1289BwL1289 changed the title GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade code to be compatible with C++23GH-47207: [C++][C++23] Upgrade Arrow to be compatible with C++23Aug 13, 2025
@kou

kou commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you rebase on main to use #47318 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou I tried rebasing just now but ran into merge conflicts I'm finding difficult to resolve. I think it's better if you do it.

@pitrou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

@kou

kou commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Perhaps we should start with C++20 as in #47330 ?

The link should be #45445 ?

I disagree, but whatever @kou wants to do.

Based on the current C++23 CI job failure, we need to require C++20 to pass the failure:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/17113416247/job/48539553905#step:6:2347

FAILED: src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_AVX512 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_BMI2 -DARROW_HAVE_RUNTIME_SSE4_2 -DARROW_HAVE_SSE4_2 -I/build/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src -I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -Wredundant-move -Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-self-move -fdiagnostics-color=always -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wdate-time -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-result -fno-semantic-interposition -msse4.2 -g -Werror -O0 -ggdb -g1 -std=c++23 -fPIC -MD -MT src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -MF src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o.d -o src/arrow/CMakeFiles/arrow_array.dir/array/array_nested.cc.o -c /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'const std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array>& arrow::StructArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1080:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1080 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:81,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.h:24,
from /arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:18:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1089:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1089 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], std::move(result));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc: In member function 'std::shared_ptr<arrow::Array> arrow::UnionArray::field(int) const':
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1360:51: error: 'std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>*) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1360 | std::shared_ptr<Array> result = std::atomic_load(&boxed_fields_[i]);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:142:5: note: declared here
142 | atomic_load(const shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/array/array_nested.cc:1372:22: error: 'void std::atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>*, shared_ptr<_Tp>) [with _Tp = arrow::Array]' is deprecated: use 'std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<T>>' instead [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
1372 | std::atomic_store(&boxed_fields_[i], result);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:183:5: note: declared here
183 | atomic_store(shared_ptr<_Tp>* __p, shared_ptr<_Tp> __r)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

We can ignore the deprecated-declarations warnings but it may hide other deprecated warnings.

Anyway, this is stuck due to the rebase failure. We can't continue this.

@lidavidm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it have to be a commit-by-commit rebase? Why not squash first, then rebase and force push?

@BwL1289

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kou please see this PR: #47415. I will close this now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@BwL1289@kou@pitrou@lidavidm@gorloffslava@kennedynguyen1