Ignore non-managed pools for storage pool access preparation

[sureshanaparti]

Description

This PR ignores non-managed pools for storage pool access preparation.

Fixes#9371

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[weizhouapache]

the logic looks good to me
thanks @sureshanaparti

[yadvr]

@sureshanaparti base branch was wrong, fixed to 4.19 now

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 4.17%. Comparing base (32cc1d4) to head (397e457).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (32cc1d4) and HEAD (397e457). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (32cc1d4)	HEAD (397e457)
unittests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## 4.19 #9376 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 15.07% 4.17% -10.91% 
============================================
Files 5405 371 -5034 Lines 472672 30420 -442252 Branches 58189 5390 -52799 ============================================
- Hits 71257 1269 -69988 + Misses 393486 29007 -364479 + Partials 7929 144 -7785 

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.17% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yadvr]

Tested in my homelab LGTM

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10333

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan test matrix

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver71, rocky8 mgmt + vmware67u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10812)
Environment: xenserver-71 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 43890 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9376-t10812-xenserver-71.zip
Smoke tests completed. 132 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10813)
Environment: vmware-67u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server r8
Total time taken: 47424 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9376-t10813-vmware-67u3.zip
Smoke tests completed. 130 look OK, 2 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
ContextSuite context=TestClusterDRS>:setup	Error	0.00	test_cluster_drs.py
test_list_system_vms_metrics_history	Failure	0.25	test_metrics_api.py

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10814)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 53683 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9376-t10814-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 130 look OK, 2 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_03_secured_to_nonsecured_vm_migration	Error	375.49	test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_04_nonsecured_to_secured_vm_migration	Error	394.31	test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_04_deploy_vnf_appliance	Error	92.45	test_vnf_templates.py
test_04_deploy_vnf_appliance	Error	92.46	test_vnf_templates.py
test_05_delete_vnf_template	Error	1.08	test_vnf_templates.py
ContextSuite context=TestVnfTemplates>:teardown	Error	2.18	test_vnf_templates.py